Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: the landscape of obstetrics and gynecology resident training

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to determine the current landscape of forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (FAVD) training in the USA (US) amongst obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents. We investigated national and regionalization of resident interest by trainee level and skill acquisition in a climate of FAVD decline. Study design An anonymous 20-question survey was distributed to US OB/GYN residency programs. Census Bureau-designated regions were used. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Respondents were compared by postgraduate year (PGY) and region. Results The survey was completed by 434 OB/GYN residents over one academic year with representation from all US regions. PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents completed statistically significant more FAVDs compared to PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents combined (p < 0.0001). By region, there was a significant difference in the number of FAVDs completed. The Midwest performed the most and Northeast performed the least (p < .0001). There was a statistically significant difference in simulation experiences by PGY (p < .0001) and by region (p = .0003) and in selfreported preparedness to perform FAVDs independently by PGY and by region. Conclusions Residents are motivated to learn FAVD. Our study is the first to demonstrate that residents are not obtaining adequate experience irrespective of geographic region. Current training should implement simulation and continued acquisition of training in FAVD.

[1]  R. Pattinson,et al.  Global perspectives on operative vaginal deliveries. , 2019, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[2]  S. Dotters-Katz,et al.  Resident Education in Complex Obstetric Procedures: Are We Adequately Preparing Tomorrow's Obstetricians? (Podcast) , 2019, American Journal of Perinatology.

[3]  Y. Afshar,et al.  Simulation to Improve Trainee Skill and Comfort with Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Deliveries , 2019, American Journal of Perinatology Reports.

[4]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2017. , 2018, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[5]  D. Gossett,et al.  Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  A. Bengtson,et al.  Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[7]  J. Barsuk,et al.  Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  T Redarce,et al.  Assessment of forceps blade orientations during their placement using an instrumented childbirth simulator , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  J. Powell,et al.  Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency , 2007, Journal of Perinatology.