Shedding light on the Hawthorne studies

The Hawthorne Studies on social influences in the workplace have weathered decades of scholarly attack. Hawthorne critics have generally misunderstood or misrepresented the modest ideological and methodological presumptions of this pioneering research, which was intended to generate, not verify, hypotheses. This article reviews the decades of controversy within the historical context of the discipline of organizational behaviour. Original research records, and recent interviews with the actual study participants support the validity and importance of the original research reports.

[1]  P. Blau.  The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[2]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[3]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[4]  E. Mayo.  The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization , 1934, Nature.

[5]  Robert Schlaifer.  The Relay Assembly Test Room: An Alternative Statistical Interpretation , 1980 .

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[7]  Harold J. Leavitt,et al.  Suppose We Took Groups Seriously... , 1974 .

[8]  T. Whitehead.  The industrial worker : a statistical study of human relations in a group of manual workers , 1938 .

[9]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[10]  Clarifying critical confusion in the Hawthorne hysteria. , 1982 .

[11]  K. G. Stansfield,et al.  A Review of: “Hawthorne Revisited : Management and the Worker, its Critics, and Developments in Human Relations in Industry”. By H, A. LANDSBERGER. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University. 1958. , 1960 .

[12]  Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld.  Commentary: Academic Learning, Worker Learning, and the Hawthorne Studies , 1983 .

[13]  Carl R. Rogers,et al.  Counseling and psychotherapy : newer concepts in practice , 1943 .

[14]  E. Louis Cass,et al.  Man and work in society , 1975 .

[15]  Florian Znaniecki,et al.  The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. , 1960 .

[16]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[17]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Structure and Process in Modern Societies , 1961 .

[18]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[19]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Behaviour in Organizations , 1977 .

[20]  H. Parsons.  What Happened at Hawthorne? , 1974, Science.

[21]  R. H. Franke,et al.  The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. , 1978 .

[22]  S. Milgram.  BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[23]  A. Rose.  Varieties of Sociological Imagination , 1969 .

[24]  R. Bales.  Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[25]  B. Pitcher.  The Hawthorne Experiments: Statistical Evidence for a Learning Hypothesis , 1981 .

[26]  R. Friend,et al.  Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology. , 1981 .

[27]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[28]  H. Blumer.  Sociological Theory in Industrial Relations , 1947 .

[29]  W. Whyte.  HUMAN RELATIONS in the Restaurant Industry , 1949 .

[30]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[31]  Clyde E. Martin,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[32]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[33]  Alex Carey,et al.  The Hawthorne Studies: A Radical Criticism , 1967 .

[34]  J. Galbraith.  The Great Crash* , 1979 .

[35]  A. Kaplan.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .