Segmentation-Free PVC for Cardiac SPECT Using a Densely-Connected Multi-Dimensional Dynamic Network

In nuclear imaging, limited resolution causes partial volume effects (PVEs) that affect image sharpness and quantitative accuracy. Partial volume correction (PVC) methods incorporating high-resolution anatomical information from CT or MRI have been demonstrated to be effective. However, such anatomical-guided methods typically require tedious image registration and segmentation steps. Accurately segmented organ templates are also hard to obtain, particularly in cardiac SPECT imaging, due to the lack of hybrid SPECT/CT scanners with high-end CT and associated motion artifacts. Slight mis-registration/mis-segmentation would result in severe degradation in image quality after PVC. In this work, we develop a deep-learning-based method for fast cardiac SPECT PVC without anatomical information and associated organ segmentation. The proposed network involves a densely-connected multi-dimensional dynamic mechanism, allowing the convolutional kernels to be adapted based on the input images, even after the network is fully trained. Intramyocardial blood volume (IMBV) is introduced as an additional clinical-relevant loss function for network optimization. The proposed network demonstrated promising performance on 28 canine studies acquired on a GE Discovery NM/CT 570c dedicated cardiac SPECT scanner with a 64-slice CT using Technetium-99m-labeled red blood cells. This work showed that the proposed network with densely-connected dynamic mechanism produced superior results compared with the same network without such mechanism. Results also showed that the proposed network without anatomical information could produce images with statistically comparable IMBV measurements to the images generated by anatomical-guided PVC methods, which could be helpful in clinical translation.

[1]  Anbang Yao,et al.  Omni-Dimensional Dynamic Convolution , 2022, ICLR.

[2]  C. Berry,et al.  Definition and epidemiology of coronary microvascular disease , 2022, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  A. Sinusas,et al.  Increasing angular sampling through deep learning for stationary cardiac SPECT image reconstruction , 2022, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  A. Sinusas,et al.  Direct and indirect strategies of deep-learning-based attenuation correction for general purpose and dedicated cardiac SPECT , 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Deep learning–based denoising of low-dose SPECT myocardial perfusion images: quantitative assessment and clinical performance , 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Hongming Shan,et al.  Deep Efficient End-to-End Reconstruction (DEER) Network for Few-View Breast CT Image Reconstruction , 2020, IEEE Access.

[7]  Tobias Rydén,et al.  Deep-Learning Generation of Synthetic Intermediate Projections Improves 177Lu SPECT Images Reconstructed with Sparsely Acquired Projections , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  A. Sinusas,et al.  Computed Tomographic Angiography Assessment of Epicardial Coronary Vasoreactivity for Early Detection of Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity , 2020, JACC. CardioOncology.

[9]  Lu Yuan,et al.  Dynamic Convolution: Attention Over Convolution Kernels , 2019, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[10]  Ge Wang,et al.  Deep Encoder-Decoder Adversarial Reconstruction (DEAR) Network for 3D CT from Few-View Data , 2019, Bioengineering.

[11]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  CondConv: Conditionally Parameterized Convolutions for Efficient Inference , 2019, NeurIPS.

[12]  Albert J. Sinusas,et al.  Quantification of intramyocardial blood volume with 99mTc-RBC SPECT-CT imaging: A preclinical study , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  Richard K. G. Do,et al.  Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology , 2018, Insights into Imaging.

[14]  Uwe Kruger,et al.  3-D Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Network for Low-Dose CT via Transfer Learning From a 2-D Trained Network , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Gang Sun,et al.  Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  P. Nguyen,et al.  Non-invasive measures of coronary microcirculation: Taking the long road to the clinic , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[17]  Mingyan Jiang,et al.  Fully automatic multi-atlas segmentation of CTA for partial volume correction in cardiac SPECT/CT , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Ge Wang,et al.  A Perspective on Deep Imaging , 2016, IEEE Access.

[19]  Hui Liu,et al.  Noise suppressed partial volume correction for cardiac SPECT/CT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[20]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Densely Connected Convolutional Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[21]  Tianyu Ma,et al.  Anatomical-based partial volume correction for low-dose dedicated cardiac SPECT/CT , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[23]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[24]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Absolute quantification in SPECT , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Leonid Tsukerman,et al.  A fast cardiac gamma camera with dynamic SPECT capabilities: design, system validation and future potential , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  G. Davidavičius,et al.  Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis , 2010 .

[28]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[29]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT and PET/CT: proven outcomes in cancer imaging. , 2009, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[30]  Jim Patton,et al.  A Novel High-Sensitivity Rapid-Acquisition Single-Photon Cardiac Imaging Camera , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[33]  D Strul,et al.  Robustness of Anatomically Guided Pixel-by-Pixel Algorithms for Partial Volume Effect Correction in Positron Emission Tomography , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[34]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Investigation of partial volume correction methods for brain FDG PET studies , 1996 .

[35]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[37]  S. Fisch Mortality from ischemic heart disease. , 1973, JAMA.

[38]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[39]  Irwin Sobel,et al.  An Isotropic 3×3 image gradient operator , 1990 .

[40]  H. Keselman,et al.  The Tukey multiple comparison test: 1953-1976. , 1977 .

[41]  I. Miyazaki,et al.  AND T , 2022 .