Neck injury criteria formulation and injury risk curves for the ejection environment: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND Helmet mounted displays provide increased pilot capability, but can also increase the risk of injury during ejection. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration's (NHTSA's) neck injury criteria (Nij) metric is evaluated for understanding the impact of helmet mass on the risk of injury and modified risk curves are developed which are compatible with the needs of the aviation community. METHODS Existent human subject data collected under various accelerative and head loading conditions were applied to understand the sensitivity of the Nij construct to changes in acceleration and helmet mass, as well as its stability with respect to gender, body mass, neck circumference, and sitting height. A portion of this data was combined with data from an earlier postmortem human subject study to create pilot study modified risk curves. These curves were compared and contrasted with the NHTSA risk curves. RESULTS A statistically significant difference in the peak mean Nij was observed when seat acceleration increased by 2 G, but not when helmet mass was varied from 1.6 kg to 2 kg at a constant seat acceleration of 8 G. Although NHTSA risk curves predict a 13% risk of AIS 2+ injury for the 8-G, 2-kg helmet condition mean Nij of 0.138, no AIS 2+ injuries were observed. Modified risk curves were produced which predict a 0.91% risk of AIS 2+ injury under these conditions. DISCUSSION The Nij was shown to be sensitive to changes in acceleration and generally robust to anthropometric differences between individuals. Modified risk curves are proposed which improve risk prediction at lower Nij values.

[1]  C. Perry,et al.  Human and manikin head/neck response to +Gz acceleration when encumbered by helmets of various weights. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Physical effects of ejection on the head-neck complex: demonstration of a cadaver model. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Scott R. Lucas,et al.  A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass , 2006 .

[4]  John R. Buhrman,et al.  The Effects of Variable Helmet Weight and Subject Bracing on Neck Loading During Frontal-GX Impact , 2004 .

[5]  Royce Moser,et al.  High-risk head and neck movements at high G and interventions to reduce associated neck injury. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[7]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  TECHNIQUES FOR DEVELOPING CHILD DUMMY PROTECTION REFERENCE VALUES EVENT REPORT , 1996 .

[8]  Richard M. Morgan,et al.  Injuries to the cervical spine caused by a distributed frontal load to the chest , 1982 .

[9]  John R. Buhrman,et al.  An Analysis of Vertebral Stress and BMD During +Gz Impact Accelerations , 2007 .

[10]  Hattie C Cutcliffe,et al.  How few? Bayesian statistics in injury biomechanics. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  James E. Melzer,et al.  Head-mounted displays , 1996 .

[12]  John R. Buhrman,et al.  A Comparison of Male and Female Acceleration Responses During Laboratory Frontal -Gx Axis Impact Tests , 2000 .

[13]  Matthew E Lewis,et al.  Survivability and injuries from use of rocket-assisted ejection seats: analysis of 232 cases. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Glenn R. Paskoff,et al.  Ejection injury to the spine in small aviators: sled tests of manikins vs. post mortem specimens. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  Akira Nakamura Ejection experience 1956-2004 in Japan: an epidemiological study. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  C. E. Rash,et al.  Helmet-mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception, and Cognition Issues , 2009 .