Stokes Profile Asymmetries in Solar Active Regions

Asymmetries in Stokes polarization spectral line profiles can be attributed to the existence of gradients in the velocity (and magnetic field) over the line-forming region. Models that solve the Stokes radiative transfer equations have incorporated both line-of-sight gradients and gradients perpendicular to the line of sight over the resolution element to produce the observed asymmetries. There have been only a few systematic studies of how these Stokes profile asymmetries vary across spatial structures and as a function of the amplitude of the velocity and magnetic fields, and very little statistical information is available. We present observational results from high spectral and spatial resolution Stokes V profile measurements made in an active region located near disk center and present correlations between the amplitude of the Stokes V asymmetry, the magnetic field strength, and line shifts and line asymmetries observed in the Stokes I profile. In regions where the field strength exceeds a few hundred gauss, we find a good correlation between the amplitude of the measured asymmetry in Stokes V and the observed shifts of the Stokes I profile. We also find a correlation between the asymmetry of the Stokes I profile and the amplitude of the Stokes V profile asymmetry.

[1]  V. Pillet,et al.  Line Asymmetries and the Microstructure of Photospheric Magnetic Fields , 1996 .

[2]  P. Martens,et al.  An Analytical Model for Fluted Sunspots and a New Interpretation of Evershed Flow and X-Ray Anemones , 1996 .

[3]  B. Lites,et al.  Performance characteristics of the advanced stokes polarimeter , 1996 .

[4]  T. Rimmele Sun Center Observations of the Evershed Effect , 1995 .

[5]  G. Cauzzi,et al.  On the calibration of line-of-sight magnetograms , 1993 .

[6]  J. Almeida,et al.  Observation and interpretation of the asymmetric Stokes Q, U, and V line profiles in sunspots , 1992 .

[7]  Steven Tomczyk,et al.  Advanced Stokes polarimeter: a new instrument for solar magnetic field research , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[8]  A. Skumanich,et al.  Transfer of line radiation in a magnetic field , 1989 .

[9]  A. Skumanich,et al.  Stokes profile analysis and vector magnetic fields. I. Inversion of photospheric lines , 1987 .

[10]  M. Makita An interpretation of the broad-band circular polarization of sunspots , 1986 .

[11]  D. Rees,et al.  Observational diagnostics for models of magnetic flux tubes , 1985 .

[12]  J. C. Kemp,et al.  Induced atomic orientation, an efficient mechanism for magnetic circular polarization , 1984 .

[13]  E. L. Degl'innocenti,et al.  Asymmetries in stokes profiles of magnetic lines: A linear analysis in terms of velocity gradients , 1983 .

[14]  J. C. Kemp,et al.  The broad-band circular polarization of sunspots, 0.37-4.5 microns , 1983 .

[15]  S. Keil The Structure of Solar Granulation - Part Two - Models of Vertical Motion , 1980 .

[16]  G. Finn,et al.  Radiation transfer through a model sunspot , 1979 .

[17]  J. Beckers Material motions in sunspot umbrae. , 1977 .

[18]  V. Grigorjev,et al.  Magnetoactive lines in the medium with the velocity gradient , 1975 .

[19]  A. Golovko The crossover effect in sunspots and the fine structure of penumbra , 1974 .

[20]  B. Koo,et al.  Observation and Interpretation of Photospheric Line Asymmetry Changes Near Active Regions , 1989 .

[21]  E. L. Degl'innocenti,et al.  Quantum theory of line formation in a magnetic field , 1972 .

[22]  V. Grigorjev,et al.  The crossover and magneto-optical effects in sunspot spectra , 1971 .