Promoting different reading comprehension levels through online annotations

Previous studies have evaluated reading comprehension as the general understanding of reading texts. However, this broad and generic assessment of reading comprehension overlooks the specific aspects and processes that students need to develop. This study adopted Kintsch's Construction–Integration model to tap into reading comprehension at different levels and investigated how English as a foreign language (EFL) students benefit from online annotations to scaffold reading comprehension. Fifty EFL students participated in this study and the data collected included (1) the pre- and post-test assessments in reading comprehension levels, (2) the students’ online annotations on reading texts, and (3) the discussion transcripts from an online discussion forum. The results from the first two data sources (1 and 2) were the data-sets used to investigate the influence of the annotation types on reading comprehension levels. The third data source was the data-set used to probe into the process of how students benefited from annotation types to reach different levels of reading comprehension. Four types of online annotations were frequently used by the students while reading online, including (1) marking vocabulary, (2) adding Chinese explanatory notes to unknown vocabulary, (3) marking text information, and (4) adding summary notes to each paragraph. Different frequencies of using the four types of online annotations resulted in three different comprehension levels: surface-based, text-based, and situation-based levels. Marking vocabulary and adding Chinese explanatory notes helped scaffold the students' learning to achieve surface comprehension levels to facilitate recognition and meaning of unknown vocabulary. Marking text information and in particular, the adding of summary notes to each paragraph were the core annotations that helped students comprehend the online text in text-based and situation-based levels. EFL teachers can guide students to use online annotations to different extents in order to deepen their reading comprehension.

[1]  Gülcan Erçetin,et al.  Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning , 2014 .

[2]  S. Best,et al.  Surface Reading: An Introduction , 2009 .

[3]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Individual and team annotation effects on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  What Makes Students Click: Working Memory and Look-Up Behavior , 2004 .

[5]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  Evaluating the role of a shared document-based annotation tool in learner-centered collaborative learning , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[6]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Shared annotation for cooperative learning , 1995, CSCL.

[7]  Jia Zhang,et al.  A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[8]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[9]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension , 2005 .

[10]  José A. Montelongo,et al.  Teaching Expository Text Structures. , 2006 .

[11]  Keming Liu.  Annotation As an Index to Critical Writing , 2006 .

[12]  Hsin-chou Huang,et al.  E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners' perceptions of an e-book reading program , 2013 .

[13]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[14]  Keith A. Roberts,et al.  Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning , 2008 .

[15]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[16]  Lee B. Abraham.  Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Evangeline S. Pianfetti,et al.  Teachers and Technology: Digital Literacy through Professional Development. , 2001 .

[18]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[19]  Jee Hwan Yun,et al.  The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a meta-analysis , 2011 .

[20]  Shiou-Wen Yeh,et al.  Learning paragraph structure with online annotations: An interactive approach to enhancing EFL reading comprehension , 2013 .

[21]  Elena Novak,et al.  The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[23]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Annotation Tool for Enhancing E-Learning Courses , 2012, ICWL.

[24]  Gülcan Erçetin,et al.  Exploring the Potential of Hypermedia Annotations for Second Language Reading , 2003 .

[25]  Miriam Alfassi.  Reading to Learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students , 2004 .

[26]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Annotation: from paper books to the digital library , 1997, DL '97.

[27]  Hironori Sasaki,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting as a prompt in text reading on a computer monitor , 2008 .

[28]  Ali Farhan AbuSeileek.  Hypermedia annotation presentation: The effect of location and type on the EFL learners' achievement in reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Using Web annotations for asynchronous collaboration around documents , 2000, CSCW '00.