ImagePAD, a novel counting application for the Apple iPad, used to quantify axons in the mouse optic nerve.

The present article introduces a new and easy to use counting application for the Apple iPad. The application "ImagePAD" takes advantage of the advanced user interface features offered by the Apple iOS platform, simplifying the rather tedious task of quantifying features in anatomical studies. For example, the image under analysis can be easily panned and zoomed using iOS-supported multi-touch gestures without losing the spatial context of the counting task, which is extremely important for ensuring count accuracy. This application allows one to quantify up to 5 different types of objects in a single field and output the data in a tab-delimited format for subsequent analysis. We describe two examples of the use of the application: quantifying axons in the optic nerve of the C57BL/6J mouse and determining the percentage of cells labeled with NeuN or ChAT in the retinal ganglion cell layer. For the optic nerve, contiguous images at 60× magnification were taken and transferred onto an Apple iPad. Axons were counted by tapping on the touch-sensitive screen using ImagePAD. Nine optic nerves were sampled and the number of axons in the nerves ranged from 38,872 axons to 50,196 axons with an average of 44,846 axons per nerve (SD = 3980 axons).

[1]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[2]  J. Hedreen What was wrong with the Abercrombie and empirical cell counting methods? A review , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[3]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[4]  S. Geuna Appreciating the difference between design‐based and model‐based sampling strategies in quantitative morphology of the nervous system , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  P. Rakic,et al.  Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  R. Strom,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Control of Variation in Retinal Ganglion Cell Number in Mice , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  R. W. Guillery On counting and counting errors , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  Nicholas Lange,et al.  Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Estimate of the total number of neurons and glial and endothelial cells in the rat spinal cord by means of the optical disector , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  R. Masland,et al.  The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Hatton,et al.  Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of the chick embryo: Calibration of the optical disector counting method reveals systematic bias , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  Mark J. West,et al.  Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  R W Guillery,et al.  Quantification without pontification: Choosing a method for counting objects in sectioned tissues , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  R. Coggeshall,et al.  Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: A case for more uniform standards of review , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  M. Abercrombie Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections , 1946, The Anatomical record.

[16]  M. West,et al.  Total number of neurons in the layers of the human entorhinal cortex , 1998, Hippocampus.