Hand usage pattern and upper body discomfort of desktop touchscreen users

A laboratory study was conducted to determine how users of different handedness interact with desktop touchscreen displays and how the hand usage pattern influences their body discomfort development. Twenty-one participants in three different handedness groups conducted simple web-browsing for 30 minutes using a 23″ touchscreen display while their subjective body discomfort, frequency of use of each hand and touch area preference were periodically quantified. Participants reported a gradual increase in body discomfort during web-browsing, and the increments in body discomfort varied between handedness groups for some body parts. Results also show that right-handed participants had stronger laterality than the left-handed, and ambidextrous participants used both hands more evenly than other participants, suggesting associations between the hand usage pattern and body discomfort development. Findings of the current study suggest that body discomfort of desktop touchscreen display users could be moderated by user-interface improvements and user training. Practitioner Summary: Body discomfort development of desktop touchscreen users may be influenced by their hand usage pattern. Findings of this laboratory study suggest that user discomfort may be moderated by placing menu items in the lower area within the display or training users to alternate hands when conducting touch gestures.

[1]  Tim Ackland,et al.  Training the non-preferred hand for fine motor control using a computer mouse , 2005 .

[2]  H S Caron,et al.  Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[3]  Nico J Delleman,et al.  Touch-typing VDU operation: workstation adjustment, working posture and workers' perceptions , 2002, Ergonomics.

[4]  Jason Ivanoff,et al.  Performance Asymmetries in Computer Mouse Control of Right-Handers, and Left-Handers with Left- and Right-Handed Mouse Experience. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Herbert Colle,et al.  Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference , 2004, Ergonomics.

[6]  J P Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Gwanseob Shin,et al.  Is the Ambidextrous Advantageous When using Large Touchscreens? , 2013 .

[8]  J. Annett,et al.  The Control of Movement in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands* , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Kamal Kothiyal,et al.  Effects of computer monitor setting on muscular activity, user comfort and acceptability in office work. , 2009, Work.

[10]  Gwanseob Shin,et al.  User discomfort, work posture and muscle activity while using a touchscreen in a desktop PC setting , 2011, Ergonomics.

[11]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[12]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Gwanseob Shin,et al.  Shoulder and neck muscle activities during typing with articulating forearm support at different heights , 2012, Ergonomics.

[14]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Computer mouse operation: is the left-handed user disadvantaged? , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  A. Spaepen,et al.  Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings , 2003, Ergonomics.

[16]  B Durding,et al.  Left-handers and right-handers compared on a motor task. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.