A Power Consumption Analysis for IP-Over-WDM Core Network Architectures

As Internet traffic is estimated to substantially grow in the near future, one of the most challenging issues will concern the reduction of its power requirement. For the core/transport section of the Internet, various network architectures can be considered, typically multi-layer architectures composed of an optical wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) transport layer under the classical electronic IP layer. Thus, we consider in this paper four architectures: basic IP over WDM with no optical switching, IP over synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) over WDM, and IP over WDM with transparent or translucent switching. Energy efficiency in these architectures is expected to be enabled by optical switching technologies, mainly due to the significant reduction in the number of required optical/electronic/optical conversions. However, since optical signals are subject to relevant physical layer impairments when traversing core network devices, signal regeneration is often required, which has to be accomplished either at the electronic layer by routers/digital cross connects (DXCs) or directly at the optical layer through 3R-regenerators. Therefore, it is important to know which network architecture may provide the highest energy efficiency. In this paper we perform a comprehensive comparison between the four above-mentioned optical core network architectures, by performing energy assessment of the devices used at the transport layer of a telecom network and by developing an integer linear programming formulation for an energy-minimized and impairment-aware design of each of the considered architectures. We find that optical technology can enable power savings up to 60% with respect to classical IP-over-WDM architectures with no optical switching, but the best “optical” architecture is not univocal, and it is influenced by some crucial network parameters (connectivity, geographical extension, etc.).

[1]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Evolution of WDM Optical IP Networks: A Cost and Energy Perspective , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  A. Wolisz,et al.  Saving energy in IP-over-WDM networks by switching off line cards in low-demand scenarios , 2010, 2010 14th Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM).

[3]  Filip Idzikowski Power consumption of network elements in IP over WDM networks , 2009 .

[4]  Achim Autenrieth,et al.  Power consumption analysis of opaque and transparent optical core networks , 2011, 2011 13th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.

[5]  J. Sole-Pareta,et al.  Performance of translucent optical networks under dynamic traffic and uncertain physical-layer information , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling.

[6]  Gangxiang Shen,et al.  Energy-Minimized Design for IP Over WDM Networks , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[7]  Francesco Musumeci,et al.  Wavelength-aware translucent network design , 2011, 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[8]  Mohit Chamania,et al.  Trading IP routing stability for energy efficiency: A case for traffic offloading with optical bypass , 2011, 15th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling - ONDM 2011.

[9]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Green Provisioning for Optical WDM Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[10]  Andrea Fumagalli,et al.  Regenerator Placement with Guaranteed Connectivity in Optical Networks , 2007, ONDM.

[11]  A Coiro,et al.  Reducing Power Consumption in Wavelength Routed Networks by Selective Switch Off of Optical Links , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[12]  Marco Mellia,et al.  Reducing Power Consumption in Backbone Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[13]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  Power Efficient Traffic Grooming in Optical WDM Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[14]  Arun K. Somani Survivability and Traffic Grooming in WDM Optical Networks , 2006 .

[15]  Hiroyuki Saito,et al.  Optimal design and evaluation of survivable WDM transport networks , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[16]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .

[17]  Didier Colle,et al.  Multilayer traffic engineering for energy efficiency , 2010, Photonic Network Communications.

[18]  D Simeonidou,et al.  Dimensioning the Future Pan-European Optical Network With Energy Efficiency Considerations , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[19]  Rudra Dutta,et al.  Traffic Grooming: A Changing Role in Green Optical Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[20]  Francesco Musumeci,et al.  On the Energy Efficiency of Optical Transport with Time Driven Switching , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[21]  Kazuhiro Oda,et al.  Power consumption analysis of optical cross-connect equipment for future large capacity optical networks , 2009, 2009 11th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.