Estimation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the invA‐gene‐based PCR Technique and a Bacteriological Culture for the Detection of Salmonella spp. in Caecal Content from Slaughtered Pigs using Bayesian Analysis

The goal of this study was to estimate the accuracy of the invA‐gene‐based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a culture technique based on pre‐enrichment with buffered peptone water, three selective enrichment media (selenite, tetrathionate and Rappaport‐Vassiliadis broths) and four selective, solid media (Xylose‐Lysine‐Tergitol‐4, Salmonella/Shigella, Hekton‐Enteric and MacConkey), for the detection of Salmonella organisms from caecal samples from slaughter pigs. For this purpose a latent‐class (Bayesian) approach was used. Two hundred and three slaughtered pigs were used after grouping them into two groups of 96 and 107 animals. Sensitivity (Se) was estimated to be 56% (95% probability interval 40, 76) for culture and 91% (81, 97) for PCR. The specificity (Sp) of the PCR was 88% (80, 95) while the Sp of the culture had been considered 100% in the statistical analysis as all culture‐positive samples were confirmed by serotyping. PCR Se was not affected by the Salmonella serotypes present in the samples analysed. Accordingly, a minimum of 25.5% of the pigs was estimated to harbour Salmonella organisms in their faeces. It was concluded that bacteriology on caecal samples alone was a poor diagnostic method, and that the PCR method could be considered a cost‐effective alternative to culture in Salmonella monitoring programmes. However, given the moderate Sp of this molecular technique, PCR‐positive samples should be further confirmed through bacteriology.

[1]  Reiner Helmuth,et al.  Multicenter Validation of the Analytical Accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an International Standard , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  M. Tamplin,et al.  Comparison of Cultivation and PCR-Hybridization for Detection ofSalmonella in Porcine Fecal and Water Samples , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  M. Ward,et al.  Evaluation of a PCR to Detect Salmonella in Fecal Samples of Horses Admitted to a Veterinary Teaching Hospital , 2005, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[4]  H. S. Hurd,et al.  Preslaughter Holding Environment in Pork Plants Is Highly Contaminated with Salmonella enterica , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  George Gettinby,et al.  Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  M. Vainstein,et al.  Influence of enrichment media and application of a PCR based method to detect Salmonella in poultry industry products and clinical samples. , 2001, Veterinary microbiology.

[7]  R. Singer,et al.  Use of Pooled Samples for the Detection of Salmonella in Feces by Polymerase Chain Reaction , 2006, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[8]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  M Greiner,et al.  Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  I A Gardner,et al.  Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  S A McEwen,et al.  Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. , 1992, Molecular and cellular probes.

[12]  R. D. Griffith,et al.  Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swine , 2004, Epidemiology and Infection.

[13]  M. Rostagno,et al.  Culture Methods Differ on the Isolation of Salmonella Enterica Serotypes from Naturally Contaminated Swine Fecal Samples , 2005, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[14]  G. Appleyard,et al.  Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine. , 2003, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[15]  W O Johnson,et al.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[16]  M Greiner,et al.  Application of diagnostic tests in veterinary epidemiologic studies. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  S. Ladely,et al.  Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[18]  H Stryhn,et al.  Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  A. Hensel,et al.  Impact of invA-PCR and culture detection methods on occurrence and survival of salmonella in the flesh, internal organs and lymphoid tissues of experimentally infected pigs. , 2004, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[20]  J. Petersen,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Different Methods for the Isolation of Salmonella from Pigs , 1991, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[21]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces. , 2000, American journal of veterinary research.

[22]  Wesley O. Johnson,et al.  Correlation‐adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests , 2003 .

[23]  H. S. Hurd,et al.  Rapid infection in market-weight swine following exposure to a Salmonella typhimurium-contaminated environment. , 2001, American journal of veterinary research.

[24]  J. Craven,et al.  The effect of time in lairage on the frequency of salmonella infection in slaughtered pigs , 1982, Journal of Hygiene.

[25]  R. Cannon,et al.  Relationship between Sample Weight, Homogeneity, and Sensitivity of Fecal Culture for Salmonella Enterica , 2002, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[26]  C. Ziemer,et al.  Evaluation of the specificity of Salmonella PCR primers using various intestinal bacterial species * , 2003, Letters in applied microbiology.

[27]  J. Funk,et al.  The Effect of Fecal Sample Weight on Detection of Salmonella Enterica in Swine Feces , 2000, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[28]  R. Isaacson,et al.  Effect of transportation and feed withdrawal on shedding of Salmonella typhimurium among experimentally infected pigs. , 1999, American journal of veterinary research.

[29]  J. Hoorfar,et al.  Toward Standardization of Diagnostic PCR Testing of Fecal Samples: Lessons from the Detection of Salmonellae in Pigs , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[30]  Jette Christensen,et al.  Herd prevalence of Salmonella enterica infections in Danish slaughter pigs determined by microbiological testing , 1996 .