Computerized Clinical Practice: Promises and Shortcomings

Technology is inundating every aspect of modern society, and clinical practice is no exception. Computer programs are currently available that conduct intake interviews, monitor treatment plans, administer, score, and interpret clinical instruments, and conduct actual therapy sessions. A survey of these applications is provided. Technologically generated knowledge may be objective but socially insensitive, because data must be conceptualized as “bits” of information. If practitioners are not careful, computers may reify the therapeutic setting. A critique of computer-generated knowledge is offered, along with suggestions pertaining to the proper use of this technology.

[1]  L Katz,et al.  Computer and manual administration of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. , 1981, Journal of clinical psychology.

[2]  M. Wagman.  PLATO DCS: An Interactive Computer System for Personal Counseling. , 1980 .

[3]  Edward H. Scissons.  Computer Administration of the California Psychological Inventory. , 1976 .

[4]  Hugh V. Angle,et al.  The interviewing computer: A technology for gathering comprehensive treatment information , 1981 .

[5]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Towards a theory of communicative competence , 1970 .

[6]  D H Gustafson,et al.  A probabilistic system for identifying suicide attemptors. , 1977, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[7]  B. Kleinmuntz.  The scientific study of clinical judgment in psychology and medicine. , 1984 .

[8]  M. Zarr.  Computer-mediated psychotherapy: toward patient-selection guidelines. , 1984, American journal of psychotherapy.

[9]  Winfield S. Bennett,et al.  Human language and computers , 1985, Comput. Humanit..

[10]  Ronette L. Kolotkin,et al.  Effects of Computerized Administration on Scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory , 1977 .

[11]  W. D. Weitzel,et al.  Toward a more efficient mental status examination. Free-form or operationally defined. , 1973, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  M. Wagman.  Autonomous Mode of Systematic Dilemma Counseling , 1981, Psychological reports.

[13]  R. W. Lucas,et al.  Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A Comparison , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  M. Wagman.  Solving Dilemmas by Computer or Counselor , 1982, Psychological reports.

[15]  Lynn Harold Vogel,et al.  Decision Support Systems in the Human Services: Discovering Limits to a Promising Technology , 1985 .

[16]  J Weizenbaum,et al.  On the impact of the computer on society. , 1972, Science.

[17]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[18]  M. Natanson,et al.  Psychiatry and Philosophy , 1969, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  J. T. Pardeck,et al.  Technology and the Manufacture of Madness , 1986, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[20]  A. Carr,et al.  Can a computer take a psychiatric history? , 1983, Psychological Medicine.

[21]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine , 1966, CACM.

[22]  M. Wagman.  A Computer Method for Solving Dilemmas , 1982 .

[23]  John W. Murphy,et al.  The Technological World-View and the Responsible Use of Computers in the Classroom , 1985 .

[24]  R. Tennyson,et al.  Applications of microcomputers in clinical psychology , 1982 .

[25]  T. A. Williams,et al.  Design considerations for an on-line computer system for automated psychiatric assessment , 1975 .

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Constraints on the validity of computer diagnosis. , 1974, Archives of general psychiatry.

[27]  A. P. Byers.  Psychological evaluation by means of an on-line computer , 1981 .

[28]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Computer power and human reason , 1976, SGAR.

[29]  Lawrence G. Space,et al.  The computer as psychometrician , 1981 .

[30]  R. Kwant.  Phenomenology of language , 1965 .

[31]  Raymond W. Carlson,et al.  Connecting Clinical Information Processing with Computer Support. , 1985 .