Providing objective metrics of team communication skills via interpersonal coordination mechanisms

Being able to communicate efficiently has been acknowledged as a vital skill in many different domains. In particular, team communication skills are of key importance in the operation of complex machinery such as aircrafts, maritime vessels and such other, highly-specialized, civilian or military vehicles, as well as the performance of complex tasks in the medical domain. In this paper, we propose to use prosodic accommodation and turntaking organisation to provide objective metrics of communication skills. To do this, human-factors evaluations, via a coordination Demand Analysis (CDA), were used in conjunction with a dynamic model of prosodic accommodation and turn-taking organisation. Using conversational speech from airline pilots involved in a collaborative task (decision-making exercise), our study reveals that interpersonal coordination mechanisms are indicative of human evaluation of pilots’ communication skills. We discuss our results in terms of relevance for training simulation for personnel in safety or mission critical environments.

[1]  Susan E. Brennan,et al.  LEXICAL ENTRAINMENT IN SPONTANEOUS DIALOG , 1996 .

[2]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Conversation and Coordinative Structures , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  M. Leonard,et al.  The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[5]  M. Pickering,et al.  Linguistic alignment between people and computers , 2010 .

[6]  Nick Campbell,et al.  Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction , 2014, Speech Commun..

[7]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills , 2008 .

[8]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[9]  Flight Training and Pilot Employment , 2002 .

[10]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation-based training , 2010, Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock.

[11]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Team Task Analysis , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Why CRM? Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Human Factors Training , 2010 .

[14]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Development of the NOTECHS (non-technical skills) system for assessing pilots’ CRM skills , 2018, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety.

[15]  Haizhou Li,et al.  An overview of text-independent speaker recognition: From features to supervectors , 2010, Speech Commun..

[16]  Sam Cromie,et al.  Measuring Crew Resource Management: Challenges and Recommendations , 2014, HCI.

[17]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[18]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics , 2010 .

[19]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[20]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .