Analysis of Blocking Probability in Noise- and Cross-Talk-Impaired All-Optical Networks

In all-optical networks with no wavelength converters, signals are switched optically inside the nodes and therefore propagate over hundreds or thousands of kilometers with no electrical regeneration. Over such distances, physical impairments, such as intersymbol interference (ISI), amplifier noise, and leaks within nodes (cross-talk), accumulate and can lead to serious signal degradation, resulting in poor quality of transmission (QoT) as measured by signal bit-error rates. The role of routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) algorithms is to accommodate incoming calls in optical networks over a route and a wavelength. RWA algorithms block calls if a continuous wavelength from the source to the destination cannot be found (wavelength blocking) or when the QoT of the call is not acceptable (QoT blocking). Evaluating RWA algorithms via simulations is possible but time consuming, and hence analytical methods are needed. Wavelength blocking has been studied analytically in the past, but QoT blocking has never been analytically modeled to our knowledge. In this paper, we present an analytical method to evaluate blocking probability in all-optical networks, accounting for physical layer impairments. Our physical layer model includes ISI and noise, two static effects that only depend on the network topology, and also cross-talk, which depends on the network state. Simulations on three different topologies with various numbers of channels, representing small- to large-scale networks, show that our technique is suitable for quick and accurate dimensioning of all-optical networks: the accuracy of the blocking rates computed with the analytical method, taking only seconds or minutes to run, is the same as that of simulations, which take hours to run.

[1]  Vincent W. S. Chan,et al.  All-Optical Network Consortium - Ultrafast TDM Networks (Invited Paper) , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[2]  M. Brandt-Pearce,et al.  Analytical study of crosstalk propagation in all-optical networks using perturbation theory , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Tao Deng,et al.  Crosstalk-aware wavelength assignment in dynamic wavelength-routed optical networks , 2004, First International Conference on Broadband Networks.

[4]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath communications: a novel approach to optical wans , 1990 .

[5]  Angela Chiu,et al.  Issues for routing in the optical layer , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[6]  B. Mukherjee,et al.  A Review of Routing and Wavelength Assignment Approaches for Wavelength- Routed Optical WDM Networks , 2000 .

[7]  Joseph C. Palais,et al.  Fiber Optic Communications Systems , 2002 .

[8]  J. M. Simmons,et al.  Optical Network Design and Planning , 2008 .

[9]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath communications: an approach to high bandwidth optical WAN's , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Piet Demeester,et al.  Optical networking: past, present and future , 2000 .

[11]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  Analysis of Blocking Probability in Noise- and Cross-Talk-Impaired All-Optical Networks , 2009 .

[12]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Analysis of blocking probability for distributed lightpath establishment in WDM optical networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Scaling limitations in transparent optical networks due to low-level crosstalk , 1995, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[14]  P. Humblet,et al.  Models of blocking probability in all-optical networks with and without wavelength changers , 1995, Proceedings of INFOCOM'95.

[15]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  WDM optical communication networks: progress and challenges , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  A path decomposition approach for computing blocking probabilities in wavelength-routing networks , 2000, TNET.

[17]  Alan E. Willner,et al.  Key Building Blocks for All-Optical Networks , 2000 .

[18]  Maïté Brandt-Pearce,et al.  Cross-layer adaptive routing and wavelength assignment in all-optical networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Computing approximate blocking probabilities for large loss networks with state-dependent routing , 1993, TNET.

[20]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  All-optical networks with sparse wavelength conversion , 1996, TNET.

[21]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Blocking in all-optical networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.