Sloppy Tags and Metacrap? Quality of User Contributed Tags in Collaborative Social Tagging Systems

There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.

[1]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Value-based metadata quality assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Tony Hammond,et al.  Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Overview , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[4]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Sample-based quality estimation of query results in relational database environments , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[5]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Paul Miller,et al.  Metadata for the Masses , 1996 .

[7]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Harris Wu,et al.  Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[9]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media , 2007, CHI.

[10]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Cardew-Hall,et al.  The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[13]  William Foster,et al.  The Organization of Information (2nd ed.) , 2004, Program.

[14]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Improving the quality of metadata in eprint archives , 2004 .

[15]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[16]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.