Operation Network Modeling With Degenerate Causal Strengths for Missile Defense Systems

A hybrid operation network model is proposed to describe and evaluate a missile defense system. More specifically, the network model provides a formal modeling approach based on the concept of the Combat Network Model. It represents uncertain information of the combat space with probabilities and the causal strengths (CAST) logic. Besides, the degenerate value of CAST parameter is discussed, and a complete conflict situation is discovered which the existing CAST algorithm cannot handle it. Furthermore, a novel modeling framework is proposed with the degenerate CAST parameters and virtual actionable nodes. The framework characterizes the missile defense process considering such factors as time delay, location, capability, and operation scope of weapons. The feasibility of the proposed model is demonstrated using a simulated example along with a sensitivity analysis. The results show the advantage of the joint control and command, identify the sensitive events/activities regarding the efficiency improvement, and suggest an optimal expected operation time window.

[1]  Zhong Liu,et al.  Distributed Combat System of Systems Network Modeling , 2013, J. Networks.

[2]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  Course of Action Analysis in a Cultural Landscape Using Influence Nets , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Security and Defense Applications.

[4]  Bingfeng Ge,et al.  A Novel Executable Modeling Approach for System-of-Systems Architecture , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[5]  Lee W. Wagenhals,et al.  Adapting C 2 to the 21 st Century Title : Model Interoperation for Effects Based Planning , 2007 .

[6]  Arthur K. Cebrowski,et al.  Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future , 1998 .

[7]  Sajjad Haider,et al.  Modeling time-varying uncertain situations using Dynamic Influence Nets , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[8]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  Creating executable models of influence nets with colored Petri nets , 1998, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.

[9]  Wu Jun,et al.  Natural Connectivity of Complex Networks , 2010 .

[10]  Abbas K. Zaidi,et al.  Transforming Timed Influence Nets into Time Sliced Bayesian Networks , 2004 .

[11]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[12]  Peter J. Mantle The missile defense equation : factors for decision making , 2004 .

[13]  Xuan Li,et al.  Weapon System Capability Assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Wayne L. Smith,et al.  Influence Net Modeling with Causal Strengths: An Evolutionary Approach , 1996 .

[15]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  On Extending Temporal Models in Timed Influence Networks , 2009 .

[16]  Matús Mihalák,et al.  The Price of Anarchy in Network Creation Games Is (Mostly) Constant , 2010, SAGT.

[17]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  Optimization of Actions in Activation Timed Influence Nets , 2009, Informatica.

[18]  Filippo Costa,et al.  Wideband Radar Cross Section Reduction of Slot Antennas Arrays , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Sajjad Haider,et al.  Effective Course-of-Action Determination to Achieve Desired Effects , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[21]  Taesik Lee,et al.  Network-based Metric for Measuring Combat Effectiveness , 2014 .

[22]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Robustness of Networks , 2013, IEEE Systems Journal.

[23]  Jau-yeu Menq,et al.  Discrete Markov ballistic missile defense system modeling , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Bo Lindstrom,et al.  EQUIVALENT COLOURED PETRI NET MODELS OF A CLASS OF TIMED INFLUENCE NETS WITH LOGIC , 2001 .