The Relative Involvement of Visual and Auditory Working Memory When Studying Adjunct Displays

In two experiments, students read a chapter-length text accompanied by seven outlines or graphic organizers. Students then performed 10 trials where they either viewed an image or listened to a sound, were tested on comprehension of the text, and then were tested on recognition of the image or sound. In both experiments, students who studied graphic organizers performed worse on the visual task, and in the second experiment, students who studied outlines performed worse on the auditory task. These results provide evidence that graphic organizers are encoded in a more visual format than outlines, whereas outlines are encoded in a more auditory format than graphic organizers. Results are also supportive of both conjoint retention (Kulhavy, Lee, & Caterino, 1985) and dual coding (Paivio, 1986) models of text learning and help to explain why graphic organizers are more effective than outlines in helping students learn concept relations in text.

[1]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse , 1985 .

[2]  Andrew D. Katayama,et al.  Interactive Effects of Graphic Organizers and Delayed Review on Concept Application , 1998 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Language , 2018, Working Memories.

[4]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[5]  Doris R. Pridemore,et al.  Using maps to retrieve text : a test of conjoint retention , 1992 .

[6]  R. Gersten,et al.  Direction-Setting Activities in Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Two Approaches , 1986 .

[7]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  How Cognitive Maps are Learned and Remembered , 1996 .

[8]  W. Wundt,et al.  An Introduction to Psychology , 1912 .

[9]  L. Brooks Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. , 1968 .

[10]  Elton B. McNeil,et al.  Psychology: Being Human , 1974 .

[11]  Andrew D. Katayama,et al.  Evidence for Conjoint Retention of Information Encoded from Spatial Adjunct Displays , 1996 .

[12]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[13]  Robinson,et al.  When Words Are Represented in Memory Like Pictures: Evidence for Spatial Encoding of Study Materials. , 1999, Contemporary educational psychology.

[14]  A. Glenberg,et al.  On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. , 1995 .