Landscape-scale water balance monitoring with an iGrav superconducting gravimeter in a field enclosure

In spite of the fundamental role of the landscape water balance for the Earth’s water and energy cycles, monitoring the water balance and its components beyond the point scale is notoriously difficult due to the multitude of flow and storage processes and their spatial heterogeneity. Here, we present the first field deployment of an iGrav superconducting gravimeter (SG) in a minimized enclosure for long-term integrative monitoring of water storage changes. Results of the field SG on a grassland site under wet–temperate climate conditions were compared to data provided by a nearby SG located in the controlled environment of an observatory building. The field system proves to provide gravity time series that are similarly precise as those of the observatory SG. At the same time, the field SG is more sensitive to hydrological variations than the observatory SG. We demonstrate that the gravity variations observed by the field setup are almost independent of the depth below the terrain surface where water storage changes occur (contrary to SGs in buildings), and thus the field SG system directly observes the total water storage change, i.e., the water balance, in its surroundings in an integrative way. We provide a framework to single out the water balance components actual evapotranspiration and lateral subsurface discharge from the gravity time series on annual to daily timescales. With about 99 and 85 % of the gravity signal due to local water storage changes originating within a radius of 4000 and 200 m around the instrument, respectively, this setup paves the road towards gravimetry as a continuous hydrological field-monitoring technique at the landscape scale.

[1]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[2]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[3]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[4]  T. Klügel,et al.  Simulating the influence of water storage changes on the superconducting gravimeter of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany , 2008 .

[5]  Philip John Binning,et al.  Using time‐lapse gravity for groundwater model calibration: An application to alluvial aquifer storage , 2011 .

[6]  Landscape-scale water balance monitoring with an iGrav superconducting gravimeter in a field enclosure , 2017 .

[7]  J. Boy,et al.  Study of the seasonal gravity signal in superconducting gravimeter data , 2006 .

[8]  T. Klügel,et al.  Correcting gravimeters and tiltmeters for atmospheric mass attraction using operational weather models , 2009 .

[9]  B. Meurers Superconducting Gravimeter Calibration by CoLocated Gravity Observations: Results from GWR C025 , 2012 .

[10]  Andreas Güntner,et al.  Modelling of global mass effects in hydrology, atmosphere and oceans on surface gravity , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  Y. Kerr,et al.  State of the Art in Large-Scale Soil Moisture Monitoring , 2013 .

[12]  M. Camp,et al.  Optimized strategy for the calibration of superconducting gravimeters at the one per mille level , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[13]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hysteresis and scale in catchment storage, flow and transport , 2015 .

[14]  Guillaume Favreau,et al.  Evaluating surface and subsurface water storage variations at small time and space scales from relative gravity measurements in semiarid Niger , 2013 .

[15]  J. Chéry,et al.  Time-lapse surface to depth gravity measurements on a karst system reveal the dominant role of the epikarst as a water storage entity , 2009 .

[16]  Umberto Riccardi,et al.  The measurement of surface gravity , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[17]  Andre Peters,et al.  Separating precipitation and evapotranspiration from noise – a new filter routine for high-resolution lysimeter data , 2013 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[19]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Direct measurement of evapotranspiration from a forest using a superconducting gravimeter , 2016 .

[20]  L. Séguis,et al.  Gravity effect of water storage changes in a weathered hard-rock aquifer in West Africa: results from joint absolute gravity, hydrological monitoring and geophysical prospection , 2013 .

[21]  T. Ferré,et al.  Accounting for time- and space-varying changes in the gravity field to improve the network adjustment of relative-gravity data , 2016 .

[22]  D. Nagy The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism , 1966 .

[23]  B. Merz,et al.  Total water storage dynamics in response to climate variability and extremes: Inference from long‐term terrestrial gravity measurement , 2012 .

[24]  B. Merz,et al.  Measuring the effect of local water storage changes on in situ gravity observations: Case study of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany , 2010 .

[25]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Field Test of the Superconducting Gravimeter as a Hydrologic Sensor , 2012, Ground water.

[26]  J. Fank,et al.  Modular Design of Field Lysimeters for Specific Application Needs , 2008 .

[27]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[28]  B. Majone,et al.  On the use of spatially distributed, time‐lapse microgravity surveys to inform hydrological modeling , 2015 .

[29]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[30]  Miroslav Šejna,et al.  Recent Developments and Applications of the HYDRUS Computer Software Packages , 2016 .

[31]  T. Blume,et al.  Reducing gravity data for the influence of water storage variations beneath observatory buildings , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[32]  S. Rosat,et al.  Noise Levels of Superconducting Gravimeters: Updated Comparison and Time Stability , 2011 .

[33]  C. Prudhomme,et al.  The European 2015 drought from a hydrological perspective , 2016 .

[34]  P. Krause,et al.  Evaluating local hydrological modelling by temporal gravity observations and a gravimetric three‐dimensional model , 2010 .

[35]  J. Chéry,et al.  On the impact of topography and building mask on time varying gravity due to local hydrology , 2013 .

[36]  D. Banka,et al.  Noise levels of superconducting gravimeters at seismic frequencies , 1999 .

[37]  U. Schreiber,et al.  Fundamentalstation Wettzell - ein geodätisches Observatorium , 2007 .

[38]  T. Niebauer Gravimetric Methods – Absolute and Relative Gravity Meter: Instruments Concepts and Implementation , 2015 .

[39]  T. Meyers,et al.  Measuring Biosphere‐Atmosphere Exchanges of Biologically Related Gases with Micrometeorological Methods , 1988 .

[40]  J. Chéry,et al.  Assessing the precision of the iGrav superconducting gravimeter for hydrological models and karstic hydrological process identification , 2017 .

[41]  B. Merz,et al.  Reducing local hydrology from high-precision gravity measurements: a lysimeter-based approach , 2010 .

[42]  Ty P. A. Ferré,et al.  Direct measurement of subsurface mass change using the variable baseline gravity gradient method , 2014 .

[43]  Bruno Merz,et al.  A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage , 2007 .

[44]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Emerging methods for noninvasive sensing of soil moisture dynamics from field to catchment scale: a review , 2015 .

[45]  S. Galle,et al.  Hydro-gravimetry in West-Africa: First results from the Djougou (Benin) superconducting gravimeter , 2014 .