Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with portable vascular ultrasonography can accurately detect deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity is an established method of detecting proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis when performed by a certified operator in a vascular laboratory. Our objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of bedside 2-point compression ultrasonography performed in the emergency department (ED) with portable vascular ultrasonography for the detection of proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. We did this by directly comparing emergency physician-performed ultrasonography to lower extremity duplex ultrasonography performed by the Department of Radiology. METHODS This was a prospective, cross-sectional study and diagnostic test assessment of a convenience sample of ED patients with a suspected lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, conducted at a single-center, urban, academic ED. All physicians had a 10-minute training session before enrolling patients. ED compression ultrasonography occurred before Department of Radiology ultrasonography and involved identification of 2 specific points: the common femoral and popliteal vessels, with subsequent compression of the common femoral and popliteal veins. The study result was considered positive for proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis if either vein was incompressible or a thrombus was visualized. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with the final radiologist interpretation of the Department of Radiology ultrasonography as the criterion standard. RESULTS A total of 47 physicians performed 199 2-point compression ultrasonographic examinations in the ED. Median number of examinations per physician was 2 (range 1 to 29 examinations; interquartile range 1 to 5 examinations). There were 45 proximal lower extremity deep venous thromboses observed on Department of Radiology evaluation, all correctly identified by ED 2-point compression ultrasonography. The 153 patients without proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis all had a negative ED compression ultrasonographic result. One patient with a negative Department of Radiology ultrasonographic result was found to have decreased compression of the popliteal vein on ED compression ultrasonography, giving a single false-positive result, yet repeated ultrasonography by the Department of Radiology 1 week later showed a popliteal deep venous thrombosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ED 2-point compression ultrasonography for deep venous thrombosis were 100% (95% confidence interval 92% to 100%) and 99% (95% confidence interval 96% to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSION Emergency physician-performed 2-point compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with a portable vascular ultrasonographic machine, conducted in the ED by this physician group and in this patient sample, accurately identified the presence and absence of proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

[1]  Stacy A. Johnson,et al.  Risk of deep vein thrombosis following a single negative whole-leg compression ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[2]  H. Büller,et al.  A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  H. Büller,et al.  Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Büller,et al.  Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study , 1998, BMJ.

[5]  K. Oniszh,et al.  Accuracy of compression ultrasound in screening for deep venous thrombosis in acutely ill medical patients , 2007, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[6]  Julie Leung,et al.  Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  E. Snoey,et al.  Emergency Department compression ultrasound to diagnose proximal deep vein thrombosis. , 2001, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[9]  M. Blaivas,et al.  Lower-extremity Doppler for deep venous thrombosis--can emergency physicians be accurate and fast? , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[10]  S. Vanni,et al.  Duplex ultrasound in the emergency department for the diagnostic management of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  M. Langsfeld,et al.  Duplex B-mode imaging for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. , 1987, Archives of surgery.

[12]  Diana Gaitini,et al.  Current approaches and controversial issues in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis via duplex Doppler ultrasound , 2006, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[13]  G. Raskob,et al.  The Clinical Validity of Normal Compression Ultrasonography in Outpatients Suspected of Having Deep Venous Thrombosis , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis , 1995, The Lancet.

[15]  S. Horii,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis: detection by probe compression of veins. , 1986, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[16]  Gabriele Siegert,et al.  Complete compression ultrasonography of the leg veins as a single test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[17]  E. Snoey,et al.  Response to letter to the editor1 , 2001 .

[18]  J. Hoak,et al.  Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. , 1996, Circulation.

[19]  J. Kline,et al.  Systematic review of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[20]  H. Büller,et al.  Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[21]  E W Salzman,et al.  Deep-vein thrombosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Goldhaber Management of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. , 2000, Clinical cornerstone.

[23]  W M O'Fallon,et al.  Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Antoine Elias,et al.  A single complete ultrasound investigation of the venous network for the diagnostic management of patients with a clinically suspected first episode of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[25]  José A López,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis. , 2004, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[26]  A. Fleischer,et al.  Sonography for Deep Venous Thrombosis: Current and Future Applications , 2005, Ultrasound quarterly.

[27]  S. Abbara,et al.  Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis , 2010, Postgraduate medicine.

[28]  T. Jang,et al.  Resident-performed compression ultrasonography for the detection of proximal deep vein thrombosis: fast and accurate. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[29]  J. Kline,et al.  Emergency clinician-performed compression ultrasonography for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[30]  M. Heller,et al.  Can emergency medicine residents detect acute deep venous thrombosis with a limited, two-site ultrasound examination? , 2007, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[31]  D. Legemate,et al.  Duplex scanning in the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. , 1991, European journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  D. Dula,et al.  Emergency department presentation of patients with conversion disorder. , 1995, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[33]  B. Zierler Ultrasonography and Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism , 2004, Circulation.

[34]  M. Blaivas,et al.  Ultrasound image quality comparison between an inexpensive handheld emergency department (ED) ultrasound machine and a large mobile ED ultrasound system. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[35]  Daniel Hind,et al.  Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  S. Keenan,et al.  Use of ultrasound to place central lines. , 2002, Journal of critical care.

[37]  J. Cronan,et al.  Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: diagnosis with limited compression US. , 1996, Radiology.

[38]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al: Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis , 1995 .

[39]  R. Poppiti,et al.  Limited B-mode venous imaging versus complete color-flow duplex venous scanning for detection of proximal deep venous thrombosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.