Clustering Strategies of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Impacts on Human-Driven Vehicles

As a promising application of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) is expected to be deployed on the public road in the near term. Thus far the majority of the CACC studies have been focusing on the overall network performance with limited insight on the potential impact of CAVs on human- driven vehicles (HVs). This paper aims to quantify the influence of CAVs on HVs by studying the high-resolution vehicle trajectory data that is obtained from microscopic simulation. Two clustering strategies for CACC are implemented: an ad hoc coordination one and a local coordination one. Results show that the local coordination outperforms the ad hoc coordination across all tested market penetration rates (MPRs) in terms of network throughput and productivity. The greatest performance difference between the two strategies is observed at 30% and 40% MPR for throughput and productivity, respectively. However, the distributions of the hard braking observations (as a potential safety impact) for HVs change significantly under local coordination strategy. Regardless of the clustering strategy, CAVs increase the average lane change frequency for HVs. 30% MPR is the break-even point for local coordination, after which the average lane change frequency decreases from the peak 5.42 to 5.38. Such inverse relationship to MPR is not found in the ah hoc case and the average lane change frequency reaches the highest 5.48 at 40% MPR.

[1]  J. Barceló Fundamentals of traffic simulation , 2010 .

[2]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic flow stability , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Lu Lin,et al.  Incorporating Driver Behaviors into Connected and Automated Vehicle Simulation , 2016 .

[4]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Nick Reed,et al.  Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers’ longitudinal control? , 2014 .

[6]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Driver Acceptance of Following Gap Settings Less than One Second , 2010 .

[7]  Rainer Wiedemann,et al.  SIMULATION DES STRASSENVERKEHRSFLUSSES. , 1974 .

[8]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[9]  I. T. Young Proof without prejudice: use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. , 1977, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[10]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[12]  Mario Gerla,et al.  A simulation tool for automated platooning in mixed highway scenarios , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[13]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Integrated Lane Change Model with Relaxation and Synchronization , 2012 .

[14]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Traffic Flow Dynamics , 2013 .

[15]  S. Fairclough,et al.  The effect of time headway feedback on following behaviour. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Zijia Zhong,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of managed lane strategies for the rapid deployment of cooperative adaptive cruise control technology , 2018 .

[17]  Steven M. Casey,et al.  Changes in speed and speed adaptation following increase in national maximum speed limit , 1992 .

[18]  Daniel J. Dailey,et al.  Freeway Micro-simulation Calibration: Case Study Using Aimsun and VISSIM with Detailed Field Data , 2014 .

[19]  J. W. C. van Lint,et al.  Will Automated Vehicles Negatively Impact Traffic Flow , 2017 .

[20]  Sheue-Ling Hwang,et al.  Effects of time-gap settings of adaptive cruise control (ACC) on driving performance and subjective acceptance in a bus driving simulator , 2009 .

[21]  Hanna Maoh,et al.  Calibrating the Wiedemann’s vehicle-following model using mixed vehicle-pair interactions , 2016 .

[22]  U Reiter EMPIRICAL STUDIES AS BASIS FOR TRAFFIC FLOW MODELS , 1994 .

[23]  Jean-Paul M. Arnaout,et al.  Exploring the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on highway traffic flow using microscopic traffic simulation , 2014 .

[24]  Peng Hao,et al.  Developing a platoon-wide Eco-Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) system , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[25]  Joyoung Lee,et al.  Evaluations of Managed Lane Strategies for Arterial Deployment of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control , 2017 .

[26]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for psychological research. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[28]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[29]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  A. Medina,et al.  Analysis of the Wiedemann Car–Following Model over Different Speeds Using Naturalistic Data , 2011 .