The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension

Recent research has identified two factors that influence consumer perceptions of a brand extension: brand affect and the similarity between the original and extension product categories. However, surprisingly little attention has been paid to other associations specific to the brand itself. The authors perform three experiments to explore the relative importance of these associations. The experiments reveal that brand-specific associations may dominate the effects of brand affect and category similarity, particularly when consumer knowledge of the brands is high. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for managerial decision making and the process by which consumers evaluate brand extensions.

[1]  D. Peabody.  Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. , 1967 .

[2]  J. H. Myers,et al.  Determinant Buying Attitudes: Meaning and Measurement , 1968 .

[3]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[4]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets , 1979 .

[5]  A. Ortony.  Beyond Literal Similarity , 1979 .

[6]  Peter Wright,et al.  Product Class Advertising Effects on First-Time Buyers' Decision Strategies , 1980 .

[7]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[8]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[9]  L. Barsalou.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management , 1986 .

[11]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[12]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[13]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations , 1988 .

[14]  P. Farquhar.  MANAGING BRAND EQUITY , 1989 .

[15]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Memory Structure of Brand Names , 1989 .

[16]  J. Jaccard,et al.  The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[18]  S. Bridges,et al.  A schema unification model of brand extensions , 1990 .

[19]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Role of Product Knowledge in Evaluation of Brand Extension , 1991 .

[20]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Substitution in Use and the Role of Usage Context in Product Category Structures , 1991 .

[21]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Brand equity : a perspective on its meaning and measurement , 1991 .

[22]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[23]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[24]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency , 1992 .

[25]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[26]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .

[27]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The role of similarity in similes and metaphors , 1993 .