A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing

BackgroundCurrently real time PCR is the most precise method by which to measure gene expression. The method generates a large amount of raw numerical data and processing may notably influence final results. The data processing is based either on standard curves or on PCR efficiency assessment. At the moment, the PCR efficiency approach is preferred in relative PCR whilst the standard curve is often used for absolute PCR. However, there are no barriers to employ standard curves for relative PCR. This article provides an implementation of the standard curve method and discusses its advantages and limitations in relative real time PCR.ResultsWe designed a procedure for data processing in relative real time PCR. The procedure completely avoids PCR efficiency assessment, minimizes operator involvement and provides a statistical assessment of intra-assay variation.The procedure includes the following steps. (I) Noise is filtered from raw fluorescence readings by smoothing, baseline subtraction and amplitude normalization. (II) The optimal threshold is selected automatically from regression parameters of the standard curve. (III) Crossing points (CPs) are derived directly from coordinates of points where the threshold line crosses fluorescence plots obtained after the noise filtering. (IV) The means and their variances are calculated for CPs in PCR replicas. (V) The final results are derived from the CPs' means. The CPs' variances are traced to results by the law of error propagation.A detailed description and analysis of this data processing is provided. The limitations associated with the use of parametric statistical methods and amplitude normalization are specifically analyzed and found fit to the routine laboratory practice. Different options are discussed for aggregation of data obtained from multiple reference genes.ConclusionA standard curve based procedure for PCR data processing has been compiled and validated. It illustrates that standard curve design remains a reliable and simple alternative to the PCR-efficiency based calculations in relative real time PCR.

[1]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[2]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[4]  Tzachi Bar,et al.  Kinetic Outlier Detection (KOD) in real-time PCR. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  G. Horgan,et al.  Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR , 2002 .

[6]  F. Vitzthum,et al.  A quantitative fluorescence-based microplate assay for the determination of double-stranded DNA using SYBR Green I and a standard ultraviolet transilluminator gel imaging system. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  F. Speleman,et al.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes , 2002, Genome Biology.

[8]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Mathematics of quantitative kinetic PCR and the application of standard curves. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Weihong Liu,et al.  A new quantitative method of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay based on simulation of polymerase chain reaction kinetics. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  Zuzana Dobbie,et al.  Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[11]  Charles M Perou,et al.  Statistical modeling for selecting housekeeper genes , 2004, Genome Biology.

[12]  Stephen A. Bustin,et al.  A-Z of Quantitative PCR , 2004 .

[13]  P Kainz,et al.  The PCR plateau phase - towards an understanding of its limitations. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[15]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  C. Wittwer,et al.  Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[17]  Barry N. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Nist Measurement Results , 2017 .

[18]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.