On the Composition of Academic Work in Digital Times

Over the last two decades, a sense of awareness has arisen that universities are facing important challenges. This article focuses on the challenge that could be broadly termed as ‘the digitisation of academic work’, yet without assuming that this digitisation would be an explanatory factor clarifying the precise nature of contemporary academic work. On the contrary, and adopting a relational actor-network theory (ANT) approach, this article stresses the concrete composition of academic work without making any general presumptions regarding how the university looks at present. Furthermore, by introducing a specific interview technique as methodological approach and different visualisations as (qualitative) analytical approach, this article offers a threefold exploratory textual and visual analysis of academic practice in the making. The article concludes, firstly, that it makes not much sense any more to talk about academic practice in terms of humans or non-humans, material or digital, etc. Instead, perhaps it makes more sense to speak of actors in academic practice as being humandigital. Secondly, the article concludes that sociomaterial approaches might constitute a fruitful addition to more traditional research about the university that is inclined to focus on epochal changes that are suggested or expected to alter the position of academics and the university.

[1]  Roger C. Schank The Virtual University , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  A. Kuntz Reconsidering the workplace: faculty perceptions of their work and working environments , 2012 .

[3]  N. Marres The Redistribution of Methods: On Intervention in Digital Social Research, Broadly Conceived , 2012 .

[4]  David A. Westbrook Navigators of the Contemporary: Why Ethnography Matters , 2008 .

[5]  M. Callon,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[7]  Terri Kim Transnational academic mobility, internationalization and interculturality in higher education , 2009 .

[8]  M. Callon,et al.  Economic markets as calculative collective devices , 2005 .

[9]  Barbara Czarniawska Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies , 2007 .

[10]  J. Tienari,et al.  Transplanting tenure and the (re)construction of academic freedoms , 2013 .

[11]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Ian P. Wei,et al.  The Global University: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives , 2012 .

[13]  M. Strathern Cutting the Network , 1996 .

[14]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[15]  Richie Nimmo,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Social Research in a More-Than-Human World , 2011 .

[16]  E. Srensen The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice , 2009 .

[17]  A. Mol The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[18]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Making Alzheimer’s disease matter. Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature , 2008 .

[19]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[20]  Jason Nolan,et al.  The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments , 2006 .

[21]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[22]  Tommaso Venturini,et al.  Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[23]  P. Landri A Return to Practice: Practice-Based Studies of Education , 2012 .

[24]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[25]  Morgan G. Ames Ethnography in Education , 2014 .

[26]  R. Bailey,et al.  Is the University in Ruins , 2008 .

[27]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[28]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Articulating Practice through the Interview to the Double , 2009 .

[29]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[30]  J. Law Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[31]  R. Barnett Being a University , 2010 .

[32]  Michael A. Peters,et al.  Chapter 3: Towards Philosophy of Technology in Education: Mapping the Field , 2006 .

[33]  C. Calhoun The University and the Public Good , 2006 .

[34]  F. McCluskey,et al.  The Idea of the Digital University: Ancient Traditions, Disruptive Technologies and the Battle for the Soul of Higher Education , 2012 .

[35]  B. Latour,et al.  'The whole is always smaller than its parts': a digital test of Gabriel Tardes' monads. , 2012, The British journal of sociology.

[36]  Martin Weller,et al.  The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Changing Academic Practice , 2011 .

[37]  M. Savage,et al.  Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form , 2006 .

[38]  T. Hooley The digital scholar: how technology is transforming scholarly practice , 2013 .

[39]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[40]  J. Murdoch Inhuman/Nonhuman/Human: Actor-Network Theory and the Prospects for a Nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society , 1997 .

[41]  Daria Loi,et al.  Ethnography, Ethnography or Ethnography? What Happens When the Same Word Means Different Things to Different People? , 2011, HCI.

[42]  T. Venturini Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory , 2010 .

[43]  R. Edwards,et al.  Actor-Network Theory in Education , 2010 .

[44]  Christopher Gad,et al.  On the Consequences of Post-ANT , 2010 .