Impacts of Real-Time Passenger Information Signs in Rail Stations at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Real-time information systems have been used in transit agencies around the world to inform passengers better of their estimated wait. In 2012, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) activated new real-time information signage across its heavy rail system. These signs displayed the estimated arrival of the next two trains in each direction. The study reported in this paper examined whether the introduction of realtime arrival signage led to reduced expectations of wait time, improved satisfaction with MBTA, and increased ridership. In-station surveys were conducted before and after real-time information was introduced to gauge changes in passenger satisfaction and wait-time expectations. These expectations were compared against headways collected from automated train tracking data. Ridership changes were measured with automated fare collection data provided by MBTA. Survey results revealed that, after the introduction of the countdown signs, people reduced their overestimation of wait time by 50%. Satisfaction with MBTA did not change significantly as a result of the real-time signage. People reported that they felt more relaxed with real-time signage if the next train arrival occurred within a scheduled headway but less relaxed in cases in which the headways were much greater than scheduled. Minor improvements in ridership were detected in stations with the real-time information after other factors were controlled for, but these results were preliminary. This study suggests that real-time arrival signage would be a positive addition to heavy rail systems to increase passenger comfort and improve perceptions of system performance in a relatively cost-effective manner with the use of existing technologies.

[1]  Karl Kottenhoff,et al.  Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers , 2007 .

[2]  Lei Tang,et al.  Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the City of Chicago , 2012 .

[3]  R. F. Casey,et al.  Advanced public transportation systems: The state of the art, update `96. Final report, July 1995-December 1996 , 1991 .

[4]  Lei Tang,et al.  Substitution or Complementarity , 2012 .

[5]  Scott B Smith,et al.  Representation of transit ITS in network-based travel models , 2005 .

[6]  윤태영,et al.  Transportation Research Board of the National Academies , 2015 .

[7]  Y. Li,et al.  EVALUATING THE URBAN COMMUTE EXPERIENCE: A TIME PERCEPTION APPROACH , 2003 .

[8]  Q. Shen,et al.  Examination of Traveler Responses to Real-Time Information about Bus Arrivals using Panel Data , 2008 .

[9]  Mark Hickman,et al.  PASSENGER TRAVEL TIME AND PATH CHOICE IMPLICATIONS OF REAL-TIME TRANSIT INFORMATION , 1995 .

[10]  Carol L Schweiger Real-Time Bus Arrival Information Systems , 2003 .

[11]  B. Taylor,et al.  Hate to Wait , 2011 .

[12]  Mark R. McCord,et al.  Evaluating Real-Time Bus Arrival Information Systems , 2000 .

[13]  Christopher Gutteridge,et al.  Disseminating real-time bus arrival information via QRcode tagged bus stops: a case study of user take-up and reaction in Southampton, UK , 2014 .

[14]  Katrin Dziekan,et al.  Psychological effects of and design preferences for real-time information displays , 2006 .