Expectation States Theory and Research

Over the past 50 years, the expectation states research program has generated a set of interrelated theories to explain the relation between performance expectations and social influence. Yet while the relationship between performance expectations and social influence is now axiomatic, the reported effects do differ in magnitude, sometimes widely. The authors present results from the first formal meta-analysis of expectation states research on social influence. Their findings indicate that theoretically unimportant study-level differences alter expectation states and the baseline propensity to accept or reject social influence. Data from 26 separate experiments reveal that protocol variations, including the use of video and computer technology, sample size, and the number of trials, have important but previously unrecognized effects. The authors close by discussing the more general implications of their research for future investigators.

[1]  Joseph Whitmeyer,et al.  When Status Equals Make Status Claims , 2005 .

[2]  L. Freese The Generalization of Specific Performance Expectations , 1976 .

[3]  B. Cohen,et al.  Eliminating Status Generalization , 1973 .

[4]  M. Foschi,et al.  On conditional hypotheses and gender as a status characteristic , 2002 .

[5]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[6]  R. Ferrer,et al.  Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis. , 1998, Family medicine.

[7]  W. Harrod Expectations from Unequal Rewards , 1980 .

[8]  G. Glass Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[9]  Shane R. Thye Reliability in Experimental Sociology , 2000 .

[10]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. , 1989 .

[11]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women , 1996 .

[12]  M. H. Fisek,et al.  Evaluations, enactment, and expectations , 2002 .

[13]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[14]  M. Foschi,et al.  Processing performance evaluations in homogeneous task groups: Feedback and gender effects , 2001 .

[15]  J. Berger,et al.  Performance Expectations and Behavior in Small Groups , 1969 .

[16]  J. Berger,et al.  Do Status Interventions Persist , 1984 .

[17]  J. Sell,et al.  Total Performance Inconsistency and Status Generalization: An Expectation States Formulation* , 1981 .

[18]  J. W. Balkwell From Expectations to Behavior: An Improved Postulate for Expectation States Theory , 1991 .

[19]  Michael J. Lovaglia,et al.  Emotional Reactions and Status in Groups , 1996 .

[20]  D. Lindley,et al.  Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model , 1972 .

[21]  A theory of second-order expectations and behavior , 1999 .

[22]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[23]  M. H. Fisek,et al.  Consistent and inconsistent status characteristics and the determination of power and prestige orders. , 1970, Sociometry.

[24]  James E. Driskell,et al.  STATUS GENERALIZATION: A REVIEW AND SOME NEW DATA* , 1978 .

[25]  R. Bales,et al.  Channels of communication in small groups. , 1951 .

[26]  M. H. Fisek,et al.  Paths of Relevance and the Determination of Power and Prestige Orders , 1976 .

[27]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Nonverbal Cues and Status: An Expectation States Approach , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  David G. Wagner,et al.  Can gender inequalities be reduced , 1986 .

[29]  J. Berger,et al.  Paths of Relevance and the Induction of Status-Task Expectancies: A Research Note , 1982 .

[30]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. , 1992 .

[31]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[32]  K. Cook,et al.  Status Characteristics, Reward Allocation, and Equity. , 1977 .

[33]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test* , 1992 .

[34]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Evaluations and the Formation of Expectations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[36]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence : a meta-analytic review , 1995 .

[37]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program , 1981 .

[38]  John D. Fox,et al.  Status Characteristics and Expectation States: Fitting and Testing a Recent Model , 1979 .

[39]  James C. Moore,et al.  Wage disparities and performance expectations , 1992 .

[40]  Jane Sell,et al.  The effect of equating status characteristics on the generalization process , 1985 .

[41]  Larry A. Hembroff Resolving Status Inconsistency: An Expectation States Theory and Test , 1982 .

[42]  The mathematics of expectation states theory , 2003 .

[43]  M. Zelditch,,et al.  How Are Inconsistencies Between Status and Ability Resolved , 1980 .

[44]  M. W. join Equating Characteristics and Social Interaction: Two Experiments , 1977 .

[45]  Z. Tran,et al.  Original metric vs. standardized effect sizes for meta-analysis of clinical data. , 2001, Preventive cardiology.

[46]  Michael W. Martin,et al.  The Marginal Utility of Information: Its Effects upon Decision-Making* , 1980 .

[47]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.