Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex

Neurocognitive studies have observed rIFC involvement in motor, cognitive, and affective inhibition, suggesting that rIFC is a common inhibitory mechanism across psychological domains. If true, intentional inhibition in one domain may have unintended inhibitory effects ("spillover") in other domains. The present study used an emotional go/no-go task that produces responses in both motor and affective domains, but induces intentional inhibition in only the motor domain. Data support the hypothesis that intentional inhibition in the motor domain, via rIFC, produces inhibitory spillover in the affective domain. Specifically, we observed increased rIFC along with reduced amygdala activity when participants intentionally inhibited motor responses during the presentation of negatively-valenced stimuli, and greater inverse connectivity between these regions during motor inhibition in a PPI analysis. Given the absence of intentional affect regulation, these results suggest that intentional inhibition of a motor response dampens the amygdala activation coincident with affective stimuli to the extent that rIFC activation is higher.

[1]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Preliminary evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in methamphetamine-dependent individuals , 2002, Psychiatry Research.

[2]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Brain Systems Mediating Cognitive Interference by Emotional Distraction , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  John M Hoffman,et al.  Ecstasy and Agony: Activation of the Human Amygdala in Positive and Negative Emotion , 2002, Psychological science.

[4]  Kevin N. Ochsner,et al.  For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion , 2003, Science.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[8]  Sang Hee Kim,et al.  Neural Correlates of Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Elliott,et al.  Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Keith M. Shafritz,et al.  The interaction of emotional and cognitive neural systems in emotionally guided response inhibition , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  The Sunny Side of Fairness , 2008, Psychological science.

[13]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[15]  K. Phan,et al.  Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  W. Gerrod Parrott,et al.  Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. , 1993 .

[17]  J. Monterosso,et al.  Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. , 2005, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[18]  R. Dolan,et al.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala , 1998, Nature.

[19]  A. David,et al.  Predictors of amygdala activation during the processing of emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of 385 PET and fMRI studies , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  G. Glover,et al.  Contributions of amygdala and striatal activity in emotion regulation , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  T. Shallice,et al.  Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Adam P. Morris,et al.  Executive Brake Failure following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe , 2006 .

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[25]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Differences in cortical activity between methamphetamine-dependent and healthy individuals performing a facial affect matching task. , 2008, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[26]  Stephan Eliez,et al.  Amygdalar activation associated with positive and negative facial expressions , 2002, Neuroreport.

[27]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Structural Abnormalities in the Brains of Human Subjects Who Use Methamphetamine , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain , 2004, Science.

[29]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Evaluation: fMRI Correlates of Valence, Emotional Intensity, and Control in the Processing of Attitudes , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Jonides,et al.  Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[34]  O. John,et al.  Emotion Regulation in Everyday Life. , 2006 .

[35]  Evian Gordon,et al.  A Direct Brainstem–amygdala–cortical Dalarmt System for Subliminal Signals of Fear , 2004 .

[36]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control , 2001, Nature.

[37]  S. Rauch,et al.  Differential prefrontal cortex and amygdala habituation to repeatedly presented emotional stimuli , 2001, Neuroreport.

[38]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief , 2003, Cognition.

[40]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Separating Sustained From Transient Aspects of Cognitive Control During Thought Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.

[41]  J. Pekar,et al.  Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.