Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures

This article discusses disagreement sequences in German and Anglo-American disputes. It is argued that the context sensitivity of preference for agreement with assessments that Pomerantz 1984 found in her data has to be elaborated and extended. My findings suggest that the preference structure can change once a dissent-turn-sequence has been displayed; in this case, opponents are expected to defend their positions. The reduction of reluctance markers creates a new preference structure which itself has to be accomplished by all participants. Concessions, defined as a participant's agreeing to the central issue after his or her prior disagreement, show reluctance markers which are viewed as indicators of the dispreferred status in other types of talk. Concessions can be distinguished from partially agreeing presequences of dissent turns. Speakers move toward concessions stepwise. Unprepared position shifts can be regarded by the interlocutors as the inability to defend an opinion. Concessions, being an interactional achievement, reframe the dispute. (Conversation analysis, dispute, context studies, expectation management)

[1]  D. Tannen Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse , 1989 .

[2]  D. Tannen New York Jewish Conversational Style , 1981 .

[3]  Ivana Marková,et al.  Asymmetries in Dialogue , 1991 .

[4]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[5]  Allen Day Grimshaw Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations , 1990 .

[6]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[7]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture , 1988 .

[8]  Anita M. Pomerantz Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[9]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[10]  D. Maynard Placement of topic changes in conversation , 1980 .

[11]  J. Bilmes The concept of preference in conversation analysis , 1988, Language in Society.

[12]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation. , 1981 .

[13]  Sally McConnell-Ginet,et al.  Women and Language in Literature and Society , 1980 .

[14]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin,et al.  Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations , 1983 .

[15]  M. Selting,et al.  Stil und Stilisierung , 1989 .

[16]  Bambi B. Schieffelin,et al.  Topic as a discourse notion: a study of topics in the conversations of children and adults , 2016 .

[17]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Papers on Language and Context. Working Papers of the Language Behavior Research Laboratory, No. 46. , 1976 .

[18]  Anita M. Pomerantz Second assessments : a study of some features of agreements/disagreements , 1975 .

[19]  Maria Schubiger,et al.  English Intonation and German Modal Particles – A Comparative Study , 1965 .

[20]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Jewish argument as sociability , 1984, Language in Society.