Region, Lesion and Border-Based Multiresolution Analysis of Mammogram Lesions

In this paper, a new method for classification of mammogram lesions is presented based on the lesion's boundary and texture profiles. A fuzzy operator for image enhancement is first used to increase the image's contrast, followed by fuzzy thresholding. Three images are generated per lesion from the enhanced and segmented regions, including: 1) region-, 2) lesion- and 3) border-based information. A single base-line system is designed to analyze all three images, based on texture, or wavelet coefficient complicated-ness. To localize texture, a shift-invariant wavelet transform (SIDWT) is employed, to ensure that it is robust to shifts. Graylevel co-occurrence matrices are found for a variety of directions in the wavelet domain, and homogeneity and entropy were extracted (resulting in a shift, scale and semi-rotational invariant feature set). Exhaustive feature selection was used with both a k-nn and LDA classifier, to find the best classification performance. The over all highest classification performance was found for LDA, 72.5% (for border-based analysis). As the highest results were achieved for the lesion boundary analysis, it proves that the shape and complexity of the border is the most discriminatory feature for the computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic lesions.

[1]  Joseph K. T. Lee,et al.  Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  R. Yager ON THE MEASURE OF FUZZINESS AND NEGATION Part I: Membership in the Unit Interval , 1979 .

[3]  S. Krishnan,et al.  Multiresolution Analysis and Classification of Small Bowel Medical Images , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Witold Kinsner,et al.  Experiments with wavelet and other edge detection techniques , 1997, IEEE WESCANEX 97 Communications, Power and Computing. Conference Proceedings.

[5]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[6]  Thomas W. Parks,et al.  Image coding using translation invariant wavelet transforms with symmetric extensions , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[9]  Etienne Kerre,et al.  Fuzzy techniques in image processing , 2000 .

[10]  April Khademi,et al.  Shift-invariant discrete wavelet transform analysis for retinal image classification , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. M. Rangayvan,et al.  Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[13]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Image thresholding by minimizing the measures of fuzzines , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  S. Krishnan,et al.  Medical image texture analysis: A case study with small bowel, retinal and mammogram images , 2008, 2008 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[15]  Anastasios Venetsanopoulos,et al.  Contrast enhancement of mammography images using a fuzzy approach , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Hans Robert Kalbitzer,et al.  NMR in Medicine and Biology , 1991 .

[17]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  H. D. Cheng,et al.  Threshold selection based on fuzzy c-partition entropy approach , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  Hamid R. Tizhoosh,et al.  /spl lambda/-enhancement: contrast adaptation based on optimization of image fuzziness , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).