THE EXPERIENCE OF EMOTION: SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON THE ELICITATION AND EXPERIENCE OF EMOTIONS

The experience of emotions and affects is a pervasive aspect of our life. We all feel well or moody on a particular day, are impatient or pleased with something we are doing and experience happiness at a compliment or anger at a slight. The present paper discusses the social context influences on the elicitation and experience of emotions from the point of view of appraisal theories. Appraisal theories of emotions posit cognitive evaluations of such aspects of the emotion eliciting event as its novelty and pleasantness, the degree to which it helps or hinders ongoing plans and goals, the degree to which the individuals believes to be able to cope with the event, the degree to which what happened appears just and unjust, etc that can be considered to underlie the emotion process. Yet, the outcome of these appraisals as well as the behavioral consequences of the outcomes are not the same for everyone and a number of situational influences have been found to be of importance in this context. In this paper I argue that these factors not only exert influence the display and labeling of emotions but also modulate the appraisal process. 1. Introduction The present paper discusses situational influences on the elicitation and experience of emotions. Specifically, such influences as cultural emotion norms and roles as well as the relationship between interaction partners in terms of power or gender are considered. These situational aspects may influence the emotion process at different points. First, they may influence the perception of the situation and thus act as a filter for those elements of the situation that enter the appraisal process. Second, they may influence the appraisal process as such. Third, they may influence the emotion display and the labeling of the subjective feeling state. The former two are influences on the elicitation of emotions, whereas the latter refer to the experience of emotions. This definition presupposes a specific view of emotions, which should be stated explicitly first. I will then briefly discuss functions of emotions and in particular the interpersonal functions of emotions. Following this, I will address the question of whether emotions are social constructs before going on to discuss

[1]  T. D. Kemper,et al.  Research agendas in the sociology of emotions , 1992 .

[2]  B. Knutson Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences , 1996 .

[3]  C. Keating,et al.  Human Dominance Signals: The Primate in Us , 1985 .

[4]  K. Scherer,et al.  Culture and emotion. , 1997 .

[5]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Emotions and emotion words , 1995 .

[6]  James A. Russell,et al.  Everyday Conceptions of Emotion , 1995 .

[7]  J. Selling The Human Person , 1998 .

[8]  Kaori Sato,et al.  The role of appraisal in human emotions: a cross-cultural study. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  T. Myers,et al.  A structural approach , 1998 .

[10]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  The Relevance of Language to the Study of Emotions , 1995 .

[11]  H. Triandis,et al.  The Shifting Basis of Life Satisfaction Judgments Across Cultures: Emotions Versus Norms , 1998 .

[12]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion , 1991 .

[13]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Antecedents of and Reactions to Emotions in the United States and Japan , 1988 .

[14]  Michael J. Cody,et al.  Gender, power, and communication in human relationships , 1996 .

[15]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[16]  K. Scherer Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  J. Russell,et al.  Concept of Emotion Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1984 .

[18]  B. Kushner Descartes' error. , 1998, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.