Spatial variability of daily weather variables in the high plains of the USA

Abstract Confidence in network measurements is more than a question of sensor performance. Measurements represent conditions at a station and are also used to infer conditions between station sites. Site measurements are incorporated into basinwide and regionwide values as well. The confidence associated with these applications is network dependent and a function of the variability imposed on the network by the atmosphere. This study was undertaken in the High Plains of the United States to determine the spatial variability of daily measurements taken in a multivariable network. The fraction of variation explained in a given weather variable at one site by that weather variable at a second site is characterized in terms of the distance of separation. It is shown that 1 year of data is not sufficient to characterize the seasonal patterns in spatial variability. To explain more than 90% of the variation in maximum temperatures between sites, a spacing of 60 km is sufficient on a year-round basis. Minimum temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and evapotranspiration require closer spacing (~30 km) to achieve this criterion while wind and soil temperature require 10 and 20 km, respectively. Spacing of precipitation gauges, for this criterion, would be less than 5 km. All results are specific to the High Plains study area. Seasonality of specific variables at this latitude is suggested as the underlying cause for observed differences in spatial variability from month to month.

[1]  Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Network Design , 1970 .

[2]  S Groot,et al.  Optimization of Water Quality Monitoring Networks , 1984 .

[3]  Jim C. Loftis,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Regional Weather Monitoring Networks , 1987 .

[4]  Jim C. Loftis,et al.  spatial Interpolation of Penman Evapotranspiration , 1987 .

[5]  J. Lomas,et al.  An objective method for assessing representativeness of a station network measuring minimum temperature near the ground , 1976 .

[6]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  A Model to Estimate the Time of Observation Bias Associated with Monthly Mean Maximum, Minimum and Mean Temperatures for the United States , 1986 .

[7]  Extrapolation of Solar Radiation Measurements: Mesoscale Analyses from Arizona and Tennessee Valley Authority Regions , 1983 .

[8]  J. Dymond Raingauge network reduction , 1982 .

[9]  John E. Hay,et al.  An Assessment of the Networks for Measuring and Modelling Solar Radiation in British Columbia and Adjacent Areas of Western Canada , 1979 .

[10]  P. S. Eagleson Optimum density of rainfall networks , 1967 .

[11]  D. Wilhite,et al.  Estimating potential evapotranspiration: the effect of random and systematic errors , 1989 .

[12]  Jean-Pierre Fortin,et al.  Use of principal component analysis to identify homogeneous precipitation stations for optimal interpolation , 1979 .

[13]  Giorgio Pini,et al.  Optimization of a snow network by multivariate statistical analysis , 1986 .

[14]  P. Lamb,et al.  Regional Climate Centers: New Institutions for Climate Services and Climate-Impact Research , 1990 .

[15]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Group Calibration of Silicon Cell Pyranometers for Use in an Automated Network , 1988 .

[16]  Kg Hubbard Climatic factors that limit daily evapo-transpiration in sorghum , 1992 .

[17]  Steven J. Meyer,et al.  Nonfederal Automated Weather Stations and Networks in the United States in the United States and Canada: A Preliminary Survey , 1992 .

[18]  Johannes J. Feddema,et al.  Influence of spatially variable instrument networks on climatic averages , 1991 .

[19]  J. Rodda AN OBJECTIVE METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AREAL RAINFALL AMOUNTS , 1962 .

[20]  S. F. Shih,et al.  Rainfall variation analysis and optimization of gaging systems , 1982 .