Groping for Quantitative Digital 3-D Image Analysis: An Approach to Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Thick Tissue Sections of Prostate Carcinoma

In molecular pathology numerical chromosome aberrations have been found to be decisive for the prognosis of malignancy in tumours. The existence of such aberrations can be detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The gain or loss of certain base sequences in the desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) can be estimated by counting the number of FISH signals per cell nucleus. The quantitative evaluation of such events is a necessary condition for a prospective use in diagnostic pathology. To avoid occlusions of signals, the cell nucleus has to be analyzed in three dimensions. Confocal laser scanning microscopy is the means to obtain series of optical thin sections from fluorescence stained or marked material to fulfill the conditions mentioned above. A graphical user interface (GUI) to a software package for display, inspection, count and (semi‐)automatic analysis of 3‐D images for pathologists is outlined including the underlying methods of 3‐D image interaction and segmentation developed. The preparative methods are briefly described. Main emphasis is given to the methodical questions of computer‐aided analysis of large 3‐D image data sets for pathologists. Several automated analysis steps can be performed for segmentation and succeeding quantification. However tumour material is in contrast to isolated or cultured cells even for visual inspection, a difficult material. For the present a fully automated digital image analysis of 3‐D data is not in sight. A semi‐automatic segmentation method is thus presented here.

[1]  G. D. Johnson,et al.  A simple method of reducing the fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy. , 1981, Journal of immunological methods.

[2]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[3]  J W Gray,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Miles,et al.  Cytogenetic study of four cancers of the prostate. , 1990, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[5]  J. McNeal Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: relationship to local and distant spread. , 1992, Human pathology.

[6]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  The significance of 3‐D transfer functions in confocal scanning microscopy , 1992 .

[7]  Andres Kriete Visualization in biomedical microscopies : 3-D imaging and computer applications , 1992 .

[8]  W. Sakr,et al.  Cytogenetics of primary prostatic adenocarcinoma. Clonality and chromosome instability. , 1992, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[9]  J. Baak,et al.  Highly sensitive, specific, and stable new fluorescent DNA stains for confocal laser microscopy and image processing of normal paraffin sections. , 1994, Cytometry.

[10]  H. Höfler,et al.  Numerical abnormalities of chromosome 7 in human prostate cancer detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on paraffin‐embedded tissue sections with centromere‐specific dna probes , 1994, The Journal of pathology.

[11]  J A Beliën,et al.  Measurement by confocal laser scanning microscopy of the volume of epidermal nuclei in thick skin sections. , 1994, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[12]  R. Becker,et al.  Enumeration of interphase chromosomes. Comparison of visual in situ hybridization and confocal fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1996, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[13]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  THREE‐DIMENSIONAL CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING DNA PLOIDY CYTOMETRY IN THICK HISTOLOGICAL SECTIONS , 1996, The Journal of pathology.

[14]  H. Netten,et al.  Automation of spot counting in interphase cytogenetics using brightfield microscopy. , 1996, Cytometry.

[15]  J P Rigaut,et al.  Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks of prostatic lesions. , 1997, Cytometry.

[16]  K. Rodenacker,et al.  Comparative FISH analysis of numerical chromosome 7 abnormalities in 5-μm and 15-μm paraffin-embedded tissue sections from prostatic carcinoma , 1997, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[17]  I Mehdi,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.