Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real‐life experiences: Intertextuality in a high‐school science classroom

Chemistry learning involves establishing conceptual relationships among macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations. Employing the notion of intertextuality to conceptualize these relationships, this study investigates how class members interactionally construct meanings of chemical representations by connecting them to real-life experiences and how the teachers' content knowledge shapes their ways to coconstruct intertextual links with students. Multiple sources of data were collected over 7 weeks with a participation of 25 eleventh graders, an experienced teacher, and a student teacher. An examination of classroom discourse shows that the intertextual links between the microscopic view of chemistry and students' real-life experiences could be initiated by students and instigated by the teachers. The teachers applied several discursive strategies to scaffold students building meaningful links based on their prior knowledge and experiences. Additionally, the experienced teacher with stronger content knowledge tended to present links in both dialogic and monologic discourses. Yet, the relatively limited content knowledge did not necessarily constrain the student teacher's interactions with students. The findings of this study provide a backdrop for further research to explore how chemistry is learned and taught in a class through the social constructivist lens. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed87:868–891, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10090

[1]  M. Pressley,et al.  Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .

[2]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Translation of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge , 1993 .

[3]  L. Resnick.  The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[4]  Ana Inés Heras.  The Construction of Understanding in a Sixth-Grade Bilingual Classroom. , 1993 .

[5]  E. Soloway,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[6]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[7]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Teaching Children Science: A Project-Based Approach , 1998 .

[8]  M. Halliday,et al.  Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective , 1989 .

[9]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[10]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[11]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[13]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[14]  Researching intertextuality within collaborative classroom learning environments , 1992 .

[15]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[16]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor , 1995 .

[17]  Roald Hoffmann,et al.  Representation in Chemistry , 1989 .

[18]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse , 1999 .

[19]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[20]  Judith L. Green,et al.  The Embeddedness of Reading in Classroom Life: Reading as a Situated Process , 1991 .

[21]  D. Gabel,et al.  The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching , 1998 .

[22]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[23]  C. Dixon,et al.  Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third‐grade classroom , 1995 .

[24]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[25]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[26]  Lichu Lin,et al.  Language of and in the classroom: Constructing the patterns of social life , 1993 .

[27]  D. Bloome,et al.  The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons , 1993 .

[28]  M. Nakhleh.  Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[29]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[30]  D. Gabel,et al.  Understanding the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 1987 .

[31]  J. Lemke.  Genres, semantics, and classroom education , 1988 .

[32]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Representation in Scientific Practice , 1990 .

[33]  Planning a Course for Success: Using an Integrated Curriculum to Prepare Students for the Twenty-First Century. , 1995 .

[34]  G. J. Kelly,et al.  An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science , 1997 .

[35]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research , 1996 .

[36]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[37]  Ana Floriani,et al.  Negotiating What Counts: Roles and Relationships, Texts and Contexts, Content and Meaning. , 1993 .