Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the NCDR

[1]  R. Stables,et al.  Long-Term Mortality Data From the Balloon Pump–Assisted Coronary Intervention Study (BCIS-1): A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Elective Balloon Counterpulsation During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2012, Circulation.

[2]  I. Palacios,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROTECT II Study , 2012, Circulation.

[3]  Nishant R. Shah,et al.  Advances in Mechanical Circulatory Support Percutaneous Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Bridge to Recovery , 2012 .

[4]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Use and Effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumps Among Patients Undergoing High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[5]  R. Stables,et al.  Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[6]  D. Wagner,et al.  Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. , 2009, European heart journal.

[8]  Biswajit Kar,et al.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  Adnan Kastrati,et al.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  K. Kent,et al.  Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  D. Burkhoff,et al.  A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. , 2006, American heart journal.

[12]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Michael S. Lee,et al.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist device: “TandemHeart” for high‐risk coronary intervention , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  G. Schuler,et al.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2003, European heart journal.

[15]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 2003, American heart journal.

[16]  H V Anderson,et al.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repository , 2001 .

[17]  W. Ghali,et al.  Variation in hospital rates of intraaortic balloon pump use in coronary artery bypass operations. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  The American College of Cardiology National Database: progress and challenges. American College of Cardiology Database Committee. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.