Exploring the effects of space and place on engagement with an interactive installation

Very little research has concurrently explored the influence of both physical space and social context (or place) on the way people engage with a public interactive display. We addressed this issue with a novel approach: studying how people engaged with the same interactive installation in ten situations with varying spatial and social properties. The main finding across these studies is that place trumps space: a conducive social context could overcome a poor physical space and encourage interaction; conversely, an inappropriate social context could inhibit interaction in spaces that might normally facilitate engagement. We discuss this finding in terms of the salience of the display within the space, the visibility of incidental interactions with the installation, the different understandings of place that people can have in the same location and the role of emergent champions and comperes in encouraging interaction.

[1]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Supporting coordination in surgical suites: physical aspects of common information spaces , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[3]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Understanding collective play in an urban screen game , 2008, CSCW.

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments , 2011, CSCW.

[5]  Jon Bird,et al.  Tabula Rasa: A Case Study in Evolutionary Curation , 2003, EvoWorkshops.

[6]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? , 2008, Pervasive.

[7]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation , 2005, ECSCW.

[8]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[9]  Tom Barker,et al.  Media facades : history, technology, content , 2009 .

[10]  Luigina Ciolfi,et al.  Understanding spaces as places: extending interaction design paradigms , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[11]  Florian Alt,et al.  Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window , 2012, CHI.

[12]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Jörg Müller,et al.  Chained displays: configurations of public displays can be used to influence actor-, audience-, and passer-by behavior , 2012, CHI.

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[15]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage , 2009, Pervasive.

[16]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display , 2010, CHI.

[17]  Jörg Müller,et al.  The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades , 2012, CHI.

[19]  David R. Millen,et al.  Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research , 2000, DIS '00.

[20]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Measuring environments for public displays: a space syntax approach , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.