Resolution enhancement in medical ultrasound imaging

Abstract. Image resolution enhancement is a problem of considerable interest in all medical imaging modalities. Unlike general purpose imaging or video processing, for a very long time, medical image resolution enhancement has been based on optimization of the imaging devices. Although some recent works purport to deal with image postprocessing, much remains to be done regarding medical image enhancement via postprocessing, especially in ultrasound imaging. We face a resolution improvement issue in the case of medical ultrasound imaging. We propose to investigate this problem using multidimensional autoregressive (AR) models. Noting that the estimation of the envelope of an ultrasound radio frequency (RF) signal is very similar to the estimation of classical Fourier-based power spectrum estimation, we theoretically show that a domain change and a multidimensional AR model can be used to achieve super-resolution in ultrasound imaging provided the order is estimated correctly. Here, this is done by means of a technique that simultaneously estimates the order and the parameters of a multidimensional model using relevant regression matrix factorization. Doing so, the proposed method specifically fits ultrasound imaging and provides an estimated envelope. Moreover, an expression that links the theoretical image resolution to both the image acquisition features (such as the point spread function) and a postprocessing feature (the AR model) order is derived. The overall contribution of this work is threefold. First, it allows for automatic resolution improvement. Through a simple model and without any specific manual algorithmic parameter tuning, as is used in common methods, the proposed technique simply and exclusively uses the ultrasound RF signal as input and provides the improved B-mode as output. Second, it allows for the a priori prediction of the improvement in resolution via the knowledge of the parametric model order before actual processing. Finally, to achieve the previous goal, while classical parametric methods would first estimate the model order and then the model parameters, our approach estimates the model parameters and the order simultaneously. The effectiveness of the methodology is validated using two-dimensional synthetic and in vivo data. We show that, compared to other techniques, our method provides better results from a qualitative and a quantitative viewpoint.

[1]  S. L. Marple,et al.  Frequency resolution of Fourier and maximum entropy spectral estimates , 1982 .

[2]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[3]  Denis Kouame,et al.  Improvement of medical image resolution using an extended 2D factorized form complex number parametric model , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  J. Ng,et al.  Wavelet restoration of medical pulse-echo ultrasound images in an EM framework , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  John William Strutt,et al.  On the Manufacture and Theory of Diffraction-Gratings , 2009 .

[6]  Hongkai Zhao,et al.  Super-resolution in time-reversal acoustics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  B. Porat,et al.  Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications. , 1988 .

[9]  Denis Kouame,et al.  Multidimensional Multiple-Order Complex Parametric Model Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Higher order versus second order statistics in ultrasound image deconvolution , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Comparison of some instrumental variable methods - Consistency and accuracy aspects , 1981, Autom..

[13]  Denis Kouame,et al.  Super-resolution in medical imaging : An illustrative approach through ultrasound , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[14]  Torfinn Taxt,et al.  High-resolution ultrasonic imaging using fast two-dimensional homomorphic filtering. , 2006, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[15]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Lesion contrast enhancement in medical ultrasound imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Piero Tortoli,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Novel Equipment for Ultrasound Research , 2006 .

[17]  Estimation of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic sphere phantom , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[18]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  Blind Deconvolution of Medical Ultrasound Images: A Parametric Inverse Filtering Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Fred Haber,et al.  A resolution measure for the MUSIC algorithm and its application to plane wave arrivals contaminated by coherent interference , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[20]  Keith Q. T. Zhang A statistical resolution theory of the AR method of spectral analysis , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[21]  Gregory T. Clement,et al.  Superresolution ultrasound imaging using back-projected reconstruction. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.