Validation of chest X-ray comparisons for unknown decedent identification.

Comparing skeletal structures between antemortem and postmortem chest radiographs is widely used by forensic specialists from many disciplines to positively identify unknown decedents. However, validity assessments of this method have been fairly limited. This study had three objectives: 1) to quantify the reliability of ante- and postmortem chest radiograph comparison for decedent identification; 2) to identify useful radiologic features supporting decedent identification; and 3) to recognize sources of error in decedent identification related to use of comparative radiographs. A forensic pathologist, a forensic anthropologist, and two radiologists participated in the study. Our results showed that chest radiograph comparisons proved reliable, if basic decedent information was provided, and antemortem and postmortem radiographs were adequately positioned and exposed. A "morphological approach" using normal anatomical structures for comparison may provide the most efficient method for accurate identification.

[1]  Singleton Ac The roentgenological identification of victims of the "Noronic" disaster. , 1951 .

[2]  T. Noguchi,et al.  A new application of forensic radiology: identification of deceased from a single clavicle. , 1972, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[3]  D. Ubelaker Positive identification of American Indian skeletal remains from radiograph comparison. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  J M Messmer,et al.  Radiographic identification of unknown human remains and interpreter experience level. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  M. Angyal,et al.  Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  W. Murphy,et al.  Radiologic identification of unknown human remains. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[8]  N. Jablonski,et al.  Identification of unknown human remains by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. , 1989, Forensic science international.

[9]  R. Mann,et al.  Positive personal identity of skeletonized remains using abdominal and pelvic radiographs. , 1992, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  M. Potsaid,et al.  Roentgenographic identification of human remains. , 1978, JAMA.

[11]  S. Jensen Identification of Human Remains Lacking Skull and Teeth: A Case Report with Some Methodological Considerations , 1991, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[12]  A. Valenzuela Radiographic comparison of the lumbar spine for positive identification of human remains. A case report. , 1997, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[13]  J. Hiss,et al.  Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster. , 1997, American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology.

[14]  J. Hiss,et al.  Positive identification by means of trabecular bone pattern comparison. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  J. Hiss,et al.  Quantitative assessment of trabecular bone pattern identification. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  T. D. Stewart Essentials of Forensic Anthropology, Especially As Developed in the United States , 1979 .