Collaborative research for sustainable learning: the case of developing innovation capabilities at Volvo Cars

This paper aims to make a contribution to the stream of literature on action research by describing a longitudinal collaborative research project which evolved out of a long-term, participation partnership with Volvo Cars. The collaboration was aimed at developing innovation capabilities in the company and accumulating knowledge on how capabilities are developed. The paper provides insights into the design of collaborative research projects to enable mutual, sustainable learning. It draws on key notions in the literature on collaborative management research and action learning, highlighting the research design of the project at Volvo Cars and its relations to action learning. The paper describes how the research design opened the way to establishing a learning system at Volvo Cars while simultaneously generating new scientific knowledge within the area of innovation capabilities. The paper provides rich and detailed data on a collaborative research setting and highlights key aspects related to organizing and undertaking collaborative research.

[1]  A. Shani,et al.  Collaborative research in organizations : foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development , 2003 .

[2]  Albert David,et al.  Collaborative Research: Alternative Roadmaps , 2004 .

[3]  Anne Grzybowski Action learning in action , 2008 .

[4]  Niclas Adler,et al.  In search of an alternative framework for the creation of actionable knowledge: Table-tennis research at Ericsson , 2001 .

[5]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Handbook of Collaborative Management Research , 2008 .

[6]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach* , 2008 .

[7]  Fredrik Dahlsten,et al.  Hollywood wives revisited: a study of customer involvement in the XC90 project at Volvo Cars , 2004 .

[8]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  David Coghlan Action Research in the Academy: Why and Whither? Reflections on the Changing Nature of Research1 , 2004 .

[10]  Rod P. Githens,et al.  Toward a reframing of action research for human resource and organization development , 2010 .

[11]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[12]  J. Swan,et al.  Explaining the Diffusion of Knowledge Management: The Role of Fashion , 2001 .

[13]  Erwin Danneels Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[14]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Designing and Implementing Collaborative Improvement in the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise: Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR) in CO-IMPROVE. , 2006 .

[15]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization , 2007 .

[16]  Maria Elmquist,et al.  Radical Innovation in a Small Firm: A Hybrid Electric Vehicle Development Project at Volvo Cars , 2010 .

[17]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Notes toward a philosophy of action learning research , 2010 .

[18]  Sofia Börjesson,et al.  Innovative scanning experiences from an idea generation project at Volvo Cars , 2006 .

[19]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR): A Methodological Integration in an Inter-Organizational Setting , 2008 .

[20]  Maria Backman,et al.  Working With Concepts in the Fuzzy Front End: Exploring the Context for Innovation for Different Types of Concepts at Volvo Cars , 2007 .

[21]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Insider/Outsider Team Research: The Development of the Approach and its Meanings , 2008 .

[22]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Organisational approaches to building a radical innovation dynamic capability , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[24]  R. Revans The Origins and Growth of Action Learning , 1982 .

[25]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[26]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[27]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[28]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Sustainable development through innovative design: lessons from the KCP method experimented with an automotive firm , 2009 .

[29]  Annika Olsson,et al.  An action learning method for increased innovation capability in organisations , 2010 .

[30]  Barbara J. Regeer,et al.  TransFormers in knowledge production: building science–practice collaborations , 2008 .

[31]  M. Assink Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model , 2006 .

[32]  M. Elmquist Vehicles for Innovation and Learning: The Case of a Neglected Concept Car Project , 2007 .

[33]  Patricia Wolf,et al.  Enhancing Organisational Innovation Capability Through Systemic Action Research: A Case of a Swiss SME in the Food Industry , 2011 .

[34]  R. W. Revans,et al.  ABC of Action Learning , 1998 .

[35]  Fredrik Dahlsten,et al.  Management action in developing market orientation: a report from a customer knowledge project at Volvo Cars , 2004 .

[36]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Collaborative Research in Organizations , 2004 .

[37]  J. Bessant,et al.  Targeting innovation and implications for capability development , 2004 .

[38]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[39]  Mats Williander On Green Innovation Inertia , 2006 .

[40]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  Longitudinal Field Studies , 2009 .

[41]  Kiran Trehan,et al.  Action learning, organisational research and the ‘wicked’ problems , 2008 .

[42]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Insider/outsider team research , 1996 .

[43]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[44]  Monder Ram,et al.  Critical action learning, policy learning and small firms: An inquiry , 2010 .

[45]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Action science and organizational learning , 1995 .

[46]  D. Weir Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 2013 .

[47]  Richard DeMartino,et al.  Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms, Journal of Product , 2006 .

[48]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[49]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Action learning: towards a framework in inter-organisational settings , 2004 .

[50]  I. Heyman Tolkning och reflektion , 1996 .

[51]  Mats Williander,et al.  Absorptive capacity and interpretation system's impact when ‘going green’: an empirical study of ford, volvo cars and toyota , 2007 .

[52]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[53]  Tobias Fredberg,et al.  Jam Sessions for collaborative management research , 2003 .

[54]  V. Marsick,et al.  The Many Faces of Action Learning , 1999 .