The coreceptor CD4 is expressed in distinct nanoclusters and does not colocalize with T-cell receptor and active protein tyrosine kinase p56lck

Significance Immune cell signaling is heavily associated with the spatial organization of molecules. Here, we examined the nanoscale organization of coreceptor CD4 and its relative spatial localization to the T-cell receptor and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck), using two different superresolution microscopy techniques photoactivated localization microscopy and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy in both living and fixed cells. With concurrent spatial analyses, we show that neither CD4/T-cell antigen receptor nor CD4/active Lck nanoclusters colocalize but only overlap at the interfaces. In activated T cells, the enhanced clustering of each kind results in increased seclusion from each other. Our observations here in molecular resolution may reveal the general roles that are played by nanoscale organization of critical components in immune cell signaling. CD4 molecules on the surface of T lymphocytes greatly augment the sensitivity and activation process of these cells, but how it functions is not fully understood. Here we studied the spatial organization of CD4, and its relationship to T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and the active form of Src kinase p56lck (Lck) using single and dual-color photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). In nonactivated T cells, CD4 molecules are clustered in small protein islands, as are TCR and Lck. By dual-color imaging, we find that CD4, TCR, and Lck are localized in their separate clusters with limited interactions in the interfaces between them. Upon T-cell activation, the TCR and CD4 begin clustering together, developing into microclusters, and undergo a larger scale redistribution to form supramolecluar activation clusters (SMACs). CD4 and Lck localize in the inner TCR region of the SMAC, but this redistribution of disparate cluster structures results in enhanced segregation from each other. In nonactivated cells these preclustered structures and the limited interactions between them may serve to limit spontaneous and random activation events. However, the small sizes of these island structures also ensure large interfacial surfaces for potential interactions and signal amplification when activation is initiated. In the later activation stages, the increasingly larger clusters and their segregation from each other reduce the interfacial surfaces and could have a dampening effect. These highly differentiated spatial distributions of TCR, CD4, and Lck and their changes during activation suggest that there is a more complex hierarchy than previously thought.

[1]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  ZAP-70: an essential kinase in T-cell signaling. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[2]  Prabuddha Sengupta,et al.  Probing protein heterogeneity in the plasma membrane using PALM and pair correlation analysis , 2011, Nature Methods.

[3]  P. Allen,et al.  Differential requirements for CD4 in TCR-ligand interactions. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[4]  J. Guardiola,et al.  Identification of a CD4 binding site on the beta 2 domain of HLA-DR molecules. , 1992, Nature.

[5]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Functional nanoscale organization of signaling molecules downstream of the T cell antigen receptor. , 2011, Immunity.

[6]  Konstantin A Lukyanov,et al.  Photoswitchable cyan fluorescent protein for protein tracking , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  Function of the Src-family kinases, Lck and Fyn, in T-cell development and activation , 2004, Oncogene.

[8]  M. Davis,et al.  Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. , 2000, Science.

[9]  P. Marrack,et al.  THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX RESTRICTED ANTIGEN RECEPTOR ON T CELLS , 2003 .

[10]  J V Giorgi,et al.  Quantitation of CD38 activation antigen expression on CD8+ T cells in HIV-1 infection using CD4 expression on CD4+ T lymphocytes as a biological calibrator. , 1998, Cytometry.

[11]  G. Zeng,et al.  NSOM/QD-Based Direct Visualization of CD3-Induced and CD28-Enhanced Nanospatial Coclustering of TCR and Coreceptor in Nanodomains in T Cell Activation , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  G. Schütz,et al.  Genetically Encoded Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Sensors for the Conformation of the Src Family Kinase Lck1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  Astrid Magenau,et al.  Pre-existing clusters of the adaptor Lat do not participate in early T cell signaling events , 2011, Nature Immunology.

[14]  Mark M Davis,et al.  TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[15]  D. Stern,et al.  The Ick tyrosine protein kinase interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of the CD4 glycoprotein through its unique amino-terminal domain , 1989, Cell.

[16]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[17]  P. Allen,et al.  Regulation of Lck activity by CD4 and CD28 in the immunological synapse , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[18]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Conformational states of the kinase Lck regulate clustering in early T cell signaling , 2012, Nature Immunology.

[19]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[20]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[21]  E. Betzig,et al.  Live-cell photoactivated localization microscopy of nanoscale adhesion dynamics , 2008, Nature Methods.

[22]  F. Dumas,et al.  Single Particle Tracking reveals two distinct environments for CD4 receptors at the surface of living T lymphocytes. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[23]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Y. Chien,et al.  CD4 augments the response of a T cell to agonist but not to antagonist ligands. , 1997, Immunity.

[25]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Dynamics of p56lck translocation to the T cell immunological synapse following agonist and antagonist stimulation. , 2002, Immunity.

[26]  R. Germain,et al.  MHC class II interaction with CD4 mediated by a region analogous to the MHC class I binding site for CD8 , 1992, Nature.

[27]  W. Schamel,et al.  Increased sensitivity of antigen-experienced T cells through the enrichment of oligomeric T cell receptor complexes. , 2011, Immunity.

[28]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[29]  P. Marrack,et al.  The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. , 1984, Annual review of immunology.

[30]  N. Burroughs,et al.  TCR dynamics on the surface of living T cells. , 2001, International immunology.

[31]  D Gani,et al.  Analysis of the aphthovirus 2A/2B polyprotein 'cleavage' mechanism indicates not a proteolytic reaction, but a novel translational effect: a putative ribosomal 'skip'. , 2001, The Journal of general virology.

[32]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[33]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. , 2008, Immunity.

[34]  Evan W. Newell,et al.  TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity , 2010, Nature.

[35]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells , 2005, Cell.

[36]  Claire Halpin,et al.  E unum pluribus: multiple proteins from a self-processing polyprotein. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[37]  Bridget S. Wilson,et al.  Plasma membrane-associated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  W. Paul,et al.  The presence of interleukin 4 during in vitro priming determines the lymphokine-producing potential of CD4+ T cells from T cell receptor transgenic mice , 1992, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[39]  R. Germain,et al.  The Efficiency of CD4 Recruitment to Ligand-engaged TCR Controls the Agonist/Partial Agonist Properties of Peptide–MHC Molecule Ligands , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[40]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[41]  D. Littman,et al.  The Kinase‐dependent Function of Lck in T‐Cell Activation Requires an Intact Site for Tyrosine Autophosphorylation a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Chermann,et al.  Surface CD4 density remains constant on lymphocytes of HIV-infected patients in the progression of disease. , 1991, Research in immunology.

[43]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[44]  R. J. Cohen,et al.  Kinetics and affinity of reactions between an antigen-specific T cell receptor and peptide-MHC complexes. , 1994, Immunity.

[45]  N. Shastri,et al.  Requirement for association of p56 lck with CD4 in antigen-specific signal transduction in T cells , 1991, Cell.

[46]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  A. Alonso,et al.  Lck Dephosphorylation at Tyr-394 and Inhibition of T Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling by Yersinia Phosphatase YopH* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  L. Philipsen,et al.  T Cell Activation Results in Conformational Changes in the Src Family Kinase Lck to Induce Its Activation , 2013, Science Signaling.

[49]  M. Davis,et al.  Low affinity interaction of peptide-MHC complexes with T cell receptors. , 1991, Science.

[50]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[51]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Constitutively Active Lck Kinase in T Cells Drives Antigen Receptor Signal Transduction , 2010, Immunity.

[52]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Photoactivatable mCherry for high-resolution two-color fluorescence microscopy , 2009, Nature Methods.

[53]  C. Janeway The T cell receptor as a multicomponent signalling machine: CD4/CD8 coreceptors and CD45 in T cell activation. , 1992, Annual review of immunology.

[54]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  Genetic evidence for the involvement of the lck tyrosine kinase in signal transduction through the T cell antigen receptor , 1992, Cell.

[56]  M. Seminario,et al.  Signal initiation in T‐cell receptor microclusters , 2008, Immunological reviews.

[57]  Tetsuo Yamazaki,et al.  T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  R. Perlmutter,et al.  Interaction of the unique N-terminal region of tyrosine kinase p56 lck with cytoplasmic domains of CD4 and CD8 is mediated by cysteine motifs , 1990, Cell.