Exergetic analysis of a desiccant cooling system: searching for performance improvement opportunities

SUMMARY The current increase of the energy consumption of buildings requires new approaches to solve economic, environmental and regulatory issues. Exergy methods are thermodynamic tools searching for sources of inefficiencies in energy conversion systems that the current energy techniques may not identify. Desiccant cooling systems (DCS) are equipments applied to dehumidifying and cooling air streams, which may provide reductions of primary energy demand relatively to conventional air-conditioning units. In this study, a detailed thermodynamic analysis of open-cycle DCS is presented. It aims to assess the overall energy and exergy performance of the plant and identify its most inefficient sub-components, associated to higher sources of irreversibilities. The main limitations of the energy methods are highlighted, and the opportunities given by exergy approach for improving the system performance are properly identified. As case study, using a pre-calibrated TRNSYS model, the overall energy and exergy efficiency of the plant were found as 32.2% and 11.8%, respectively, for a summer week in Mediterranean climate. The exergy efficiency defect identified the boiler (69.0%) and the chiller (12.3%) as the most inefficient components of the plant, so their replacement by high efficient systems is the most rational approach for improving its performance. As alternative heating system to the boiler, a set of different technologies and integration of renewables were proposed and evaluated applying the indicators: primary energy ratio (PER) and exergy efficiency. The heating system fuelled by wood was found as having the best primary energy performance (PER = 109.6%), although the related exergy efficiency is only 11.4%. The highest exergy performance option corresponds to heat pump technology with coefficient of performance (COP) = 4, having a PER of 50.6% and exergy efficiency of 28.2%. Additionally, the parametric analyses conducted for different operating conditions indicate that the overall irreversibility rate increases moderately for larger cooling effects and more significant for higher dehumidification rates. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Guoqiang Zhang,et al.  A combined system of chilled ceiling, displacement ventilation and desiccant dehumidification , 2007 .

[2]  Radu Zmeureanu,et al.  Exergy analysis of variable air volume systems for an office building , 2009 .

[3]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Exergetic modeling and experimental performance assessment of a novel desiccant cooling system , 2011 .

[4]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Desiccant wheel regenerated by thermal energy from a microcogenerator: Experimental assessment of the performances , 2011 .

[5]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Experimental validation of constant efficiency models for the subsystems of an unconventional desiccant-based Air Handling Unit and investigation of its performance , 2012 .

[6]  Abdulghani A. Al-Farayedhi,et al.  Exergy analysis of a liquid-desiccant-based, hybrid air-conditioning system , 1998 .

[7]  Nianping Li,et al.  Exergy performance and thermodynamic properties of the ideal liquid desiccant dehumidification syste , 2010 .

[8]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system in Turkey , 2007 .

[9]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Desiccant HVAC system driven by a micro-CHP: Experimental analysis , 2010 .

[10]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of an experimental open-cycle desiccant cooling system. , 2004 .

[11]  Dietrich Schmidt.  Low Exergy Systems for High-Performance Buildings and Communities , 2009 .

[12]  Ivar S. Ertesvåg,et al.  Exergetic comparison of efficiency indicators for combined heat and power (CHP) , 2007 .

[13]  D. A. Hindoliya,et al.  Artificial neural network based modelling of desiccant wheel , 2011 .

[14]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Experimental investigation to optimise a desiccant HVAC system coupled to a small size cogenerator , 2011 .

[15]  Z. Lavan,et al.  Second Law Analysis of Desiccant Cooling Systems , 1982 .

[16]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Design and simulation of a solar assisted desiccant-based air handling unit , 2011 .

[17]  Kuan Chen,et al.  Maximum efficiency of solar energy conversion , 2012 .

[18]  Adélio Rodrigues Gaspar,et al.  Energy and exergy-based indicators for the energy performance assessment of a hotel building , 2012 .

[19]  Michael A. Gerber,et al.  EnergyPlus Energy Simulation Software , 2014 .

[20]  Josua P. Meyer,et al.  Thermodynamic optimisation of the integrated design of a small‐scale solar thermal Brayton cycle , 2012 .

[21]  Mohammed Khennich,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of power cycles using a finite low‐temperature heat source , 2012 .

[22]  Mohamed Gadalla,et al.  Performance assessment of a liquid‐phase separation refrigeration cycle , 2012 .

[23]  Yong Li,et al.  Study on a novel thermally driven air conditioning system with desiccant dehumidification and regenerative evaporative cooling , 2010 .

[24]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Distributed microtrigeneration systems , 2012 .

[25]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  Development of a novel two-stage liquid desiccant dehumidification system assisted by CaCl2 solution using exergy analysis method , 2010 .

[26]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia , 2004 .

[27]  P. G. Luscuere,et al.  An exergy application for analysis of buildings and HVAC systems , 2010 .