WERITAS: weighted ensemble of regional image textures for ASM segmentation

In this paper we present WERITAS, which is based in part on the traditional Active Shape Model (ASM) segmentation system. WERITAS generates multiple statistical texture features, and finds the optimal weighted average of those texture features by maximizing the correlation between the Euclidean distance to the ground truth and the Mahalanobis distance to the training data. The weighted average is used a multi-resolution segmentation system to more accurately detect the object border. A rigorous evaluation was performed on over 200 clinical images comprising of prostate images and breast images from 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla MRI machines via 6 distinct metrics. WERITAS was tested against a traditional multi-resolution ASM in addition to an ASM system which uses a plethora of random features to determine if the selection of features is improving the results rather than simply the use of multiple features. The results indicate that WERITAS outperforms all other methods to a high degree of statistical significance. For 1.5T prostate MRI images, the overlap from WERITAS is 83%, the overlap from the random features is 81%, and the overlap from the traditional ASM is only 66%. In addition, using 3T prostate MRI images, the overlap from WERITAS is 77%, the overlap from the random features is 54%, and the overlap from the traditional ASM is 59%, suggesting the usefulness of WERITAS. The only metrics in which WERITAS was outperformed did not hold any degree of statistical significance. WERITAS is a robust, efficient, and accurate segmentation system with a wide range of applications.

[1]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Robust active appearance models and their application to medical image analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 1998, ECCV.

[3]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Minimal Shape and Intensity Cost Path Segmentation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A consensus embedding approach for segmentation of high resolution in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imagery , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Boosting Cascade for Automated Detection of Prostate Cancer from Digitized Histology , 2006, MICCAI.

[6]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A multi-modal prostate segmentation scheme by combining spectral clustering and active shape models , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Y. Takane,et al.  Generalized Inverse Matrices , 2011 .

[8]  A. L. Edwards,et al.  An introduction to linear regression and correlation. , 1985 .

[9]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Active shape model segmentation with optimal features , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Jim Graham,et al.  Robust Active Shape Model Search , 2002, ECCV.

[12]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Multi-resolution search with active shape models , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A COMBINED FEATURE ENSEMBLE BASED MUTUAL INFORMATION SCHEME FOR ROBUST INTER-MODAL, INTER-PROTOCOL IMAGE REGISTRATION , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multi-Attribute Non-initializing Texture Reconstruction Based Active Shape Model (MANTRA) , 2008, MICCAI.

[16]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[17]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..