Monitoringthe burialenvironment of terrestrialwet archaeologicalsitesinTheN etherlands

Monitoring the burial environment of archaeological sites is necessary to assess the success of their preservation in situ. Also, monitoring the state of preservation of actual archaeological remains together with that of their burial environment will further our understanding of the degradation processes acting on archaeological remains in situ. These remains consist not only of objects made from wood, metal, stone, etc., but also of pollen, soil features and even micromorphological features. Although, to date, the precise degradation mechanisms of archaeological remains in situ are not yet fully understood, general agreement exists on which parameters should be monitored in wet terrestrial environments. Also, it has been established that in situ measurements are preferable to laboratory analyses of soil (water) samples. In practice, it is difficult to find suitable monitoring equipment for in situ measurement as it must meet many requirements: an in situ measuring principle; stable for a period of at least several months; robust for use in the field; and equipped with a datalogger. A suitable principle exists for measuring the redox potential, however a simple, robust field instrument with datalggger is not yet available. Monitoring of the water table level, temperature and oxygen content is possible with recently developed, commercially available instruments. Monitoring of acidity is less complex as it does not vary as rapidly as, for example, the redox potential; however, the recommended method is still based on analysing soil samples, which is not acceptable in the long term at archaeological sites.

[1]  Henry Chapman,et al.  Monitoring and Modelling Saturation as a Proxy Indicator for in situ Preservation in Wetlands—a GIS-based Approach , 2002 .

[2]  C. Caple Defining a reburial environment: research problems characterising waterlogged anoxic environments , 1994 .

[3]  R. J. Bartlett,et al.  System for categorizing soil redox status by chemical field testing , 1995 .

[4]  Harry Kenward,et al.  Decay of delicate organic remains in shallow urban deposits: are we at a watershed? , 2000, Antiquity.

[5]  Martin Knotters Regionalised time series models for water table depths , 2001 .

[6]  A. Wheeler Environmental Controls on Shipwreck Preservation: The Irish Context , 2002 .

[7]  A. Pollard,et al.  Here today, gone tomorrow? integrated experimentation and geochemical modeling in studies of archaeological diagenetic change. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[8]  A. Nord,et al.  Corrosion of archaeological bronze artefacts in acidic soil , 1995 .

[9]  I. Oxley The Investigation of the Factors That Affect the Preservation of Underwater Archaeological Sites , 1998 .

[10]  J. Podany,et al.  Preservation of the Laetoli hominid trackway in Tanzania , 1996 .

[11]  H. Kars Preserving our in situ archaeological heritage: a challenge to the geochemical engineer , 1998 .

[12]  Stephen P. Faulkner,et al.  Field Techniques for Measuring Wetland Soil Parameters , 1989 .

[13]  Mark D. Williams,et al.  Oxygenation of anoxic water in a fluctuating water table system: an experimental and numerical study , 2000 .

[14]  C. Kessel,et al.  Construction and evaluation of a reference electrode assembly for use in monitoring in situ soil redox potentials , 1991 .

[15]  B. Jordan Site characteristics impacting the survival of historic waterlogged wood : A review , 2001 .

[16]  Ingrid Ward,et al.  A New Process-based Model for Wreck Site Formation , 1999 .

[17]  G. Swerhone,et al.  Construction and Testing of a Durable Platinum Wire Eh Electrode for In Situ Redox Measurements in the Subsurface , 1999 .

[18]  Florian Malard,et al.  Oxygen supply and the adaptations of animals in groundwater , 1999 .