Landscape Ecology Perspective in Restoration Projects for Biodiversity Conservation: a Review

There is good evidence that the results of a restoration program depend largely on the landscape context such as habitat cover, connectivity and isolation. Such evidence, however, is not coherently presented in the scientific literature. This review aims to provide an overview of how landscape ecology has been used in restoration projects in the last 15 years. We found only 54 empirical restoration studies published in international journals from 1997 to 2011 that used a landscape approach, mostly published between 2009 and 2011. The majority of the studies were carried out in temperate zones and forests, with habitat loss and fragmentation as the major disturbance factor (77%). Biotic manipulation was the most common management protocol (39%), followed by abiotic manipulation, land abandonment, and control of disturbance sources. Most of the studies (84%) demonstrate that the landscape context plays an important role in restoration processes. Particularly, a positive influence of the landscape context on restoration effectiveness was observed for restored areas in close proximity to neighboring patches and in landscapes with high habitat cover. However, we found that the effect of landscape characteristics on restoration outcomes may vary with species characteristics, and differ according to the population or community parameters (e.g. abundance, richness, composition) considered. In addition, different landscape aspects mediated the effects of restoration on biological communities, and thus there is not a unique set of landscape indices that can be universally used for restoration planning and monitoring. Although the literature has important gaps, since most studies are restricted to few habitat and disturbance types and consider only a limited set of landscape attributes, our findings demonstrate that landscape characteristics can be as important as local factors in influencing restoration outcomes and should be incorporated in restoration projects and programmes. By considering a wide range of landscape resilience and disturbance condition since the beginning of future restoration plans, we expect that the main gaps of knowledge identified here can be filled in the near future, helping then to reveal a more general pattern relating landscape structure to restoration outcomes.

[1]  K. Esler,et al.  Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta‐analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals , 2010 .

[2]  Pi-Hui Huang,et al.  Eco-environmental changes assessment at the Chiufenershan landslide area caused by catastrophic earthquake in Central Taiwan , 2008 .

[3]  Michael J. Osland,et al.  Restoring diversity after cattail expansion: disturbance, resilience, and seasonality in a tropical dry wetland. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  A Goal-Oriented Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration , 2012, World Forests.

[5]  R. Marrs,et al.  Soil seed bank formation during early revegetation after hydroseeding in reclaimed coal wastes , 2009 .

[6]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region , 2009 .

[7]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  Global State of Biodiversity and Loss , 2003 .

[8]  J. Bowman,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Composition on the Biotic Community of Constructed Depressional Wetlands , 2010 .

[9]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[10]  A. Guerrero,et al.  Passive Restoration in Biodiversity Hotspots: Consequences for an Atlantic Rainforest Lizard Taxocene , 2010 .

[11]  S. Galatowitsch,et al.  Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-reflooding , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[12]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[13]  Daniele Fanelli,et al.  Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.

[14]  James Aronson,et al.  Vital landscape attributes: missing tools for restoration ecology , 1996 .

[15]  Carla Catterall,et al.  How much do site age, habitat structure and spatial isolation influence the restoration of rainforest beetle species assemblages? , 2007 .

[16]  L. Poorter,et al.  Is spatial structure the key to promote plant diversity in Mediterranean forest plantations , 2011 .

[17]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Instrumentos legais podem contribuir para a restaurao de florestas tropicais biodiversas , 2010 .

[18]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Impacts of Restored Patch Density and Distance from Natural Forests on Colonization Success , 2003 .

[19]  Tamzen K. Stringham,et al.  Recommendations for Development of Resilience-Based State-and-Transition Models , 2008 .

[20]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  A Framework to Optimize Biodiversity Restoration Efforts Based on Habitat Amount and Landscape Connectivity , 2014 .

[21]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: Implications for conservation , 2008 .

[22]  A. Lõhmus,et al.  Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  J. Watling,et al.  Fragments as Islands: a Synthesis of Faunal Responses to Habitat Patchiness , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  R. Chazdon.  Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded Lands , 2008, Science.

[25]  Felix Kienast,et al.  River widening: an approach to restoring riparian habitats and plant species , 2005 .

[26]  Z. Naveh,et al.  From Biodiversity to Ecodiversity: A Landscape‐Ecology Approach to Conservation and Restoration , 1994 .

[27]  Stefan Brunzel,et al.  Effects of re‐braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers , 2009 .

[28]  Karen D. Holl,et al.  When and where to actively restore ecosystems , 2011 .

[29]  A. G. Endress,et al.  Rate of succession in restored wetlands and the role of site context , 2010 .

[30]  N. Williams.  Restoration of Nontarget Species: Bee Communities and Pollination Function in Riparian Forests , 2011 .

[31]  L. Wes Burger,et al.  Avian community response to pine—grassland restoration , 2004 .

[32]  Göran Sahlén,et al.  Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes : Biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales , 2009 .

[33]  M. Holmgren,et al.  Science on the Rise in Developing Countries , 2004, PLoS biology.

[34]  J. Metzger,et al.  Can agroforest woodlots work as stepping stones for birds in the Atlantic forest region? , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[35]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  F. Comín,et al.  Integrating objectives and scales for planning and implementing wetland restoration and creation in agricultural landscapes. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[38]  Donglai Li,et al.  Patterns of waterbird community composition across a natural and restored wetland landscape mosaic, Yellow River Delta, China , 2011 .

[39]  J. Metzger,et al.  Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes , 2010, PloS one.

[40]  K. Holl,et al.  Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants , 2004 .

[41]  R. Mac Nally,et al.  Native bird breeding in a chronosequence of revegetated sites , 2009, Oecologia.

[42]  Joern Fischer,et al.  Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  A. Burke,et al.  Determining Landscape Function and Ecosystem Dynamics: Contribution to Ecological Restoration in the Southern Namib Desert , 2001, Ambio.

[44]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[45]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[46]  Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues,et al.  On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. , 2009 .

[47]  K. Holl,et al.  Landscape Restoration: Moving from Generalities to Methodologies , 2003 .

[48]  J. Metzger,et al.  Associations of Forest Cover, Fragment Area, and Connectivity with Neotropical Understory Bird Species Richness and Abundance , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success , 2005 .

[50]  S. McLachlan,et al.  Outcomes of longterm deciduous forest restoration in southwestern Ontario, Canada , 2003 .

[51]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology , 1996 .

[52]  Herwig Waidbacher,et al.  Rehabilitation of a Heavily Modified River Section of the Danube in Vienna (Austria): Biological Assessment of Landscape Linkages on Different Scales , 2002 .

[53]  J. Benayas,et al.  Effects of woodland islets introduced in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape on local bird communities , 2009 .

[54]  V. Kapos,et al.  Comparing species and measures of landscape structure as indicators of conservation importance , 2011 .

[55]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[56]  S. Ribeiro,et al.  Ants as Bioindicators of Natural Succession in Savanna and Riparian Vegetation Impacted by Dredging in the Jequitinhonha River Basin, Brazil , 2010 .

[57]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Setting Effective and Realistic Restoration Goals: Key Directions for Research , 2007 .

[58]  A. G. Endress,et al.  Relative influence of landscape vs. local factors on plant community assembly in restored wetlands. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[59]  F. Herzog,et al.  Effects of agri-environmental measures, site and landscape conditions on butterfly diversity of Swiss grassland , 2007 .