POBE: A Computer Program for Optimal Design of Multi-Subject Blocked fMRI Experiments

For functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, researchers can use multi-subject blocked designs to identify active brain regions for a certain stimulus type of interest. Before performing such an experiment, careful planning is necessary to obtain efficient stimulus effect estimators within the available financial resources. The optimal number of subjects and the optimal scanning time for a multi-subject blocked design with fixed experimental costs can be determined using optimal design methods. In this paper, the user-friendly computer program POBE 1.2 (program for optimal design of blocked experiments, version 1.2) is presented. POBE provides a graphical user interface for fMRI researchers to easily and efficiently design their experiments. The computer program POBE calculates the optimal number of subjects and the optimal scanning time for user specified experimental factors and model parameters so that the statistical efficiency is maximised for a given study budget. POBE can also be used to determine the minimum budget for a given power. Furthermore, a maximin design can be determined as efficient design for a possible range of values for the unknown model parameters. In this paper, the computer program is described and illustrated with typical experimental factors for a blocked fMRI experiment.

[1]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related FMRI with multiple trial types Part I: theory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Satoru Hayasaka,et al.  Development of PowerMap: a Software Package for Statistical Power Calculation in Neuroimaging Studies , 2012, Neuroinformatics.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Convolution Models for fMRI , 2007 .

[4]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[5]  M. Lindquist.  The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. , 2008, 0906.3662.

[6]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Optimal design of multi-subject blocked fMRI experiments , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Experimental Design for Brain fMRI , 2000 .

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[10]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  Estimating the global order of the fMRI noise model , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Toshiharu Nakai,et al.  The effect of task block arrangement on the detectability of activation in fMRI. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Robustness of optimal design of fMRI experiments with application of a genetic algorithm , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. Goebel,et al.  Optimization of Blocked Designs in fMRI Studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a Refractory Period in the Hemodynamic Response to Visual Stimuli as Measured by MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS , 2007 .

[18]  Guillaume P. Dehaene,et al.  Functional segregation of cortical language areas by sentence repetition , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  W. D. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Abhyuday Mandal,et al.  Multi-objective optimal experimental designs for event-related fMRI studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J.A. Mumford,et al.  Modeling and inference of multisubject fMRI data , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[24]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Detection versus Estimation in Event-Related fMRI: Choosing the Optimal Stimulus Timing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Event-related fMRI in cognition , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  S. Faro,et al.  Investigation of Alternating and Continuous Experimental Task Designs During Single Finger Opposition fMRI: A Comparative Study , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  R. Goebel,et al.  Exploring brain function with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Ming-Hung Kao,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimal Experimental Designs for ER-fMRI Using MATLAB , 2009 .