GIS-Based Identification of Locations in Water Distribution Networks Vulnerable to Leakage

The detection of leakages in Water Distribution Networks (WDNs) is usually challenging and identifying their locations may take a long time. Current water leak detection methods such as model-based and measurement-based approaches face significant limitations that impact response times, resource requirements, accuracy, and location identification. This paper presents a method for determining locations in the WDNs that are vulnerable to leakage by combining six leakage-conditioning factors using logistic regression and vulnerability analysis. The proposed model considered three fixed physical factors (pipe length per junction, number of fittings per length, and pipe friction factor) and three varying operational aspects (drop in pressure, decrease in flow, and variations in chlorine levels). The model performance was validated using 13 district metered areas (DMAs) of the Sharjah Electricity and Water Authority (SEWA) WDN using ArcGIS. Each of the six conditioning factors was assigned a weight that reflects its contribution to leakage in the WDNs based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The highest weight was set to 0.25 for both pressure and flow, while 0.2 and 0.14 were set for the chlorine and number of fittings per length, respectively. The minimum weight was set to 0.08 for both length per junction and friction factor. When the model runs, it produces vulnerability to leakage maps, which indicate the DMAs’ vulnerability classes ranging from very high to very low. Real-world data and different scenarios were used to validate the method, and the areas vulnerable to leakage were successfully identified based on fixed physical and varying operational factors. This vulnerability map will provide a comprehensive understanding of the risks facing a system and help stakeholders develop and implement strategies to mitigate the leakage. Therefore, water utility companies can employ this method for corrective maintenance activities and daily operations. The proposed approach can offer a valuable tool for reducing water production costs and increasing the efficiency of WDN.

[1]  Manreet Kaur,et al.  Evaluation of the Factors Impacting the Water Pipe Leak Detection Ability of GPR, Infrared Cameras, and Spectrometers under Controlled Conditions , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[2]  Shima Mohebbi,et al.  Predictive analytics for water main breaks using spatiotemporal data , 2021 .

[3]  Feifei Zheng,et al.  State-of-the-art review on the transient flow modeling and utilization for urban water supply system (UWSS) management , 2020 .

[4]  Juan Pablo Rodríguez,et al.  Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Pipe Failure Modeling in Water Distribution Networks , 2020, Water.

[5]  Ilan Juran,et al.  Machine-Learning–Based Risk Assessment Method for Leak Detection and Geolocation in a Water Distribution System , 2020 .

[6]  C. Catita,et al.  Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Due to Sea Level Rise: The Case Study of the Atlantic Coast of Mainland Portugal , 2020, Water.

[7]  Suvi Ahopelto,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analysis of Leakage Reduction Methods in Water Supply Networks , 2020 .

[8]  P. Bernatchez,et al.  Quantifying road vulnerability to coastal hazards: Development of a synthetic index , 2019, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[9]  M. O. A. Alsaydalani,et al.  Simulation of Pressure Head and Chlorine Decay in a Water Distribution Network: A Case Study , 2019, The Open Civil Engineering Journal.

[10]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Impacts of Water Quality on the Spatiotemporal Susceptibility of Water Distribution Systems , 2019, CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water.

[11]  Yskandar Hamam,et al.  A state-of-the-art review of an optimal sensor placement for contaminant warning system in a water distribution network , 2018, Urban Water Journal.

[12]  G. Soppe,et al.  Water Utility Turnaround Framework , 2018 .

[13]  R. Liemberger,et al.  Quantifying the global non-revenue water problem , 2018, Water Supply.

[14]  Dongwoo Jang,et al.  A Parameter Classification System for Nonrevenue Water Management in Water Distribution Networks , 2018 .

[15]  Dongwoo Jang,et al.  Estimation of Non-Revenue Water Ratio for Sustainable Management Using Artificial Neural Network and Z-Score in Incheon, Republic of Korea , 2017 .

[16]  Lam Tang Van,et al.  Assessment of water pipes durability under pressure surge , 2017 .

[17]  J. E. van Zyl,et al.  Evaluating the pressure-leakage behaviour of leaks in water pipes , 2017 .

[18]  G. M. G. Farok,et al.  Non-Revenue Water (NRW) is a challenge for Global Water Supply System Management: A case study of Dhaka Water Supply System Management , 2017 .

[19]  N. H. Badi Properties of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates and Bias Reduction for Logistic Regression Model , 2017 .

[20]  Rezaul Chowdhury,et al.  Leakage and failures of water distribution mains in the city of Al Ain, UAE. , 2016 .

[21]  Jong Min Lee,et al.  Robust leak detection and its localization using interval estimation for water distribution network , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Tarig A. Ali,et al.  A GIS-based spatiotemporal study of the variability of water quality in the Dubai Creek, UAE , 2016 .

[23]  Sridharakumar Narasimhan,et al.  A Graph Partitioning Algorithm for Leak Detection in Water Distribution Networks , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  D. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Water leakage detection using remote sensing, field spectroscopy and GIS in semiarid areas of Cyprus , 2016 .

[25]  J. Roberson,et al.  The Financial and Policy Implications of Water Loss , 2016 .

[26]  David J. Williams,et al.  Remote sensing of CO2 leakage from geologic sequestration projects , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[27]  C. Berg The drivers of non-revenue water : how effective are non-revenue water reduction programs ? , 2014 .

[28]  Nicole Metje,et al.  SmartPipes: Smart Wireless Sensor Networks for Leak Detection in Water Pipelines , 2014, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[30]  William J. Elliot,et al.  Spatially and temporally distributed modeling of landslide susceptibility , 2006 .

[31]  L. Ayalew,et al.  Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications , 2005 .

[32]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[33]  J. Magnus,et al.  Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics (Revised Edition) , 1999 .

[34]  Pedro J. Lee,et al.  Transient wave-based methods for anomaly detection in fluid pipes: A review , 2021 .

[35]  Ivan Sekovski,et al.  Development of a coastal vulnerability index using analytical hierarchy process and application to Ravenna province (Italy) , 2020 .

[36]  Lizeth Torres,et al.  Localization of Leaks in Water Distribution Networks using Flow Readings , 2018 .

[37]  Osama Moselhi,et al.  Multi-tier method using infrared photography and GPR to detect and locate water leaks , 2016 .

[38]  Shin Je Lee,et al.  Robust Leakage Detection and Interval Estimation of Location in Water Distribution Network , 2015 .

[39]  K. Busawon,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the leakage characteristics of unburied HDPE pipes , 2015 .

[40]  Alfeu Sá Marques,et al.  Locating Leaks in Water Distribution Networks with Simulated Annealing and Graph Theory , 2015 .

[41]  H. F. Zohra,et al.  Vulnerability assessment of water supply network , 2012 .

[42]  Nguyen Mai Dang,et al.  Evaluation of food risk parameters in the Day River Flood Diversion Area, Red River Delta, Vietnam , 2011 .

[43]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .