A Strategy for Classification of “Vaginal vs. Cesarean Section” Delivery: Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition of Cardiotocographic Recordings

We propose objective and robust measures for the purpose of classification of “vaginal vs. cesarean section” delivery by investigating temporal dynamics and complex interactions between fetal heart rate (FHR) and maternal uterine contraction (UC) recordings from cardiotocographic (CTG) traces. Multivariate extension of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) yields intrinsic scales embedded in UC-FHR recordings while also retaining inter-channel (UC-FHR) coupling at multiple scales. The mode alignment property of EMD results in the matched signal decomposition, in terms of frequency content, which paves the way for the selection of robust and objective time-frequency features for the problem at hand. Specifically, instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency of multivariate intrinsic mode functions are utilized to construct a class of features which capture nonlinear and nonstationary interactions from UC-FHR recordings. The proposed features are fed to a variety of modern machine learning classifiers (decision tree, support vector machine, AdaBoost) to delineate vaginal and cesarean dynamics. We evaluate the performance of different classifiers on a real world dataset by investigating the following classifying measures: sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and mean squared error (MSE). It is observed that under the application of all proposed 40 features AdaBoost classifier provides the best accuracy of 91.8% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity, 98% AUC, and 5% MSE. To conclude, the utilization of all proposed time-frequency features as input to machine learning classifiers can benefit clinical obstetric practitioners through a robust and automatic approach for the classification of fetus dynamics.

[1]  Sofia C. Olhede,et al.  Analysis of Modulated Multivariate Oscillations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Petr Gajdos,et al.  Human Fetus Health Classification on Cardiotocographic Data Using Random Forests , 2014, ECC.

[3]  Saqib Saleem,et al.  Wavelet decomposition analysis is a clinically relevant strategy to evaluate cerebrovascular buffering of blood pressure after spinal cord injury. , 2018, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  WestonJason,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[5]  B. Roe,et al.  Boosted decision trees as an alternative to artificial neural networks for particle identification , 2004, physics/0408124.

[6]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  R. E. Tainsh,et al.  Fetal heart rate monitoring. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  William McGuire,et al.  Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  F. Plaat,et al.  Why Mothers Die — Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–96 , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Automatic Evaluation of FHR Recordings from CTU-UHB CTG Database , 2013, ITBAM.

[11]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Multi-Scale Pixel-Based Image Fusion Using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2015, Sensors.

[12]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Aly Chkeir,et al.  Combining multiple support vector machines for boosting the classification accuracy of uterine EMG signals , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems.

[14]  Stephen J Payne,et al.  Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Ljubisa Stankovic,et al.  Synchrosqueezing-based time-frequency analysis of multivariate data , 2015, Signal Process..

[16]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Sparse Support Vector Machine for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[17]  Ersen Yilmaz,et al.  Determination of Fetal State from Cardiotocogram Using LS-SVM with Particle Swarm Optimization and Binary Decision Tree , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[18]  Roberto Sassi,et al.  Multiparametric analysis of fetal heart rate: comparison of neural and statistical classifiers , 2001 .

[19]  Gregory E. Chamitoff,et al.  Orders-of-magnitude performance increases in GPU-accelerated correlation of images from the International Space Station , 2010, Journal of Real-Time Image Processing.

[20]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Dynamically-Sampled Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[21]  Klaus D. McDonald-Maier,et al.  FPGA-Based Real-Time Implementation of Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2019, Circuits Syst. Signal Process..

[22]  S Cerutti,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Variability due to Vibroacoustic Stimulation: Linear and Nonlinear Contribution , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[23]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Paul D. Teal,et al.  Identification of human sympathetic neurovascular control using multivariate wavelet decomposition analysis. , 2016, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[25]  Paul D. Teal,et al.  Detection of Impaired Sympathetic Cerebrovascular Control Using Functional Biomarkers Based on Principal Dynamic Mode Analysis , 2017, Frontiers in physiology.

[26]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[27]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Pregnancy: Contributions from Advanced Signal Processing and Wearable Technology , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[28]  Hasan Ocak,et al.  A Medical Decision Support System Based on Support Vector Machines and the Genetic Algorithm for the Evaluation of Fetal Well-Being , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[29]  C. Dirksen,et al.  SIMPLE: implementation of recommendations from international evidence-based guidelines on caesarean sections in the Netherlands. Protocol for a controlled before and after study , 2013, Implementation Science.

[30]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Artificial neural networks applied to fetal monitoring in labour , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[31]  Zixiang Xiong,et al.  Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules , 2005, Bioinform..

[32]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Multifractal analysis of fetal heart rate variability in fetuses with and without severe acidosis during labor. , 2011, American journal of perinatology.

[33]  M G Jibukumar,et al.  Ictal EEG classification based on amplitude and frequency contours of IMFs , 2017 .

[34]  Petr Gajdos,et al.  Classification of cardiotocography records by random forest , 2013, 2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[35]  Rami J Oweis,et al.  Seizure classification in EEG signals utilizing Hilbert-Huang transform , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[36]  Tomasz M. Rutkowski,et al.  Bivariate EMD-based image fusion , 2009, 2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[37]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring during Labor: A Critique and a Reply to Contemporary Proponents , 2018, The Surgery Journal.

[38]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  D. P. Mandic,et al.  Multivariate empirical mode decomposition , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[40]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Computerized Cardiotocography: A Software to Generate Synthetic Signals , 2014 .

[41]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[42]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Discriminating Normal from "Abnormal" Pregnancy Cases Using an Automated FHR Evaluation Method , 2014, SETN.

[43]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[44]  David A. Belsley A Guide to using the collinearity diagnostics , 1991, Computer Science in Economics and Management.

[45]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[47]  H. Rahman,et al.  Admission cardiotocography: Its role in predicting foetal outcome in high-risk obstetric patients. , 2012, The Australasian medical journal.

[48]  J. Hoh,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of fetal heart rate dynamics in fetuses compromised by asymptomatic partial placental abruption. , 2015, Placenta.

[49]  Ram Bilas Pachori,et al.  A Multivariate Approach for Patient-Specific EEG Seizure Detection Using Empirical Wavelet Transform , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the fetal heart rate signal for the identification of fetal distress , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[51]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  A Multivariate Empirical Mode DecompositionBased Approach to Pansharpening , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[52]  Edmond Zahedi,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[53]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Spectral analysis of antepartum heart rate variability. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[54]  Maria Romano,et al.  Foetal heart rate variability frequency characteristics with respect to uterine contractions , 2010 .

[55]  Doina Precup,et al.  Identification of the Dynamic Relationship Between Intrapartum Uterine Pressure and Fetal Heart Rate for Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  Maria Romano,et al.  Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of Foetal Heart Rate Variability with Traditional Indexes: A Critical Survey , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[57]  Philip A. Warrick,et al.  Discrimination of normal and at-risk populations from fetal heart rate variability , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[58]  Muhammad Salman Mustafa,et al.  Characterisation of ictal and interictal states of epilepsy: A system dynamic approach of principal dynamic modes analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[59]  Özge Tunçalp,et al.  Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[60]  Paul Fergus,et al.  Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[61]  Kazuo Maeda,et al.  Uterine Contractions in Normal Labor Developed by a Positive Feed-backand Oscillation , 2013 .

[62]  João Bernardes,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate Variability , 2016 .

[63]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Feature Extraction and Classification of Fetal Heart Rate Using Wavelet Analysis and Support Vector Machines , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[64]  VZ Marmarelis,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Modeling of Cerebral Flow Autoregulation Using Principal Dynamic Modes , 2012, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[65]  Huan Hao,et al.  A joint framework for multivariate signal denoising using multivariate empirical mode decomposition , 2017, Signal Process..

[66]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[67]  E. Lim,et al.  Traditional beliefs and practices in pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: A review of the evidence from Asian countries. , 2018, Midwifery.

[68]  O. Shmueli,et al.  Interpretation of nonstress tests by an artificial neural network. , 1995, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[69]  Chung-Kang Peng,et al.  Multimodal pressure-flow method to assess dynamics of cerebral autoregulation in stroke and hypertension , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[70]  Philip A. Warrick,et al.  Subspace detection of the impulse response function from intrapartum uterine pressure and fetal heart rate variability , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[71]  B. Schifrin,et al.  INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT AUSCULTATION: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[72]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[73]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Boosting , 1999, IJCAI.

[74]  Aixia Guo,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[75]  Agreement of three interpretation systems of intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring by different levels of physicians , 2017, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[76]  R. Horton,et al.  An evolution in global health. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[77]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machines for FHR Classification and Assessing the pH Based Categorization , 2016 .

[78]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[79]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Prognostic model based on image-based time-frequency features and genetic algorithm for fetal hypoxia assessment , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[80]  Tshilidzi Marwala,et al.  System dynamics of active and passive postural changes: Insights from principal dynamic modes analysis of baroreflex loop , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[81]  Klaus D. McDonald-Maier,et al.  Seizure detection from EEG signals using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[82]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[83]  P. Mckenna,et al.  Successful reduction of massive postpartum haemorrhage by use of guidelines and staff education , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[84]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[85]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..

[86]  Maria Romano,et al.  Foetal heart rate power spectrum response to uterine contraction , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[87]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Fractal Analysis and Hurst Parameter for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Analysis: A Versatile Alternative to Frequency Bands and LF/HF Ratio , 2015, PloS one.