Problem-solving in technology education as an approach to education for sustainable development

This paper explores the issue of how students might learn about sustainability in technology––education classrooms and the relevance of problem-solving in that learning. One of the emerging issues in technology education research is the nature of problem-solving specified in curriculum documents and the kinds of learning activities undertaken by students in technology education classrooms. In parallel with our developing understanding of the characteristics of good technology education programs is the inclusion in recent curriculum documents of the concept of sustainability or sustainable development. However, as yet there is little information about how technology students think about sustainability and how they might best learn about it. This is of particular interest because in technology education, sustainability is often described in curriculum documents as an issue that is intended to be integrated within design projects and activities, rather than being the topic of a classroom lesson as might happen in a subject such as environmental studies. This paper explores current understanding of the issue generally and within technology education. It concludes that the design, problem-solving approach that is common to technology education classrooms provides many affordances to students engaging meaningfully with ideas of sustainability and of developing strong understandings of its scope and significance.

[1]  John Charles Stevenson Innovative thinking as meaning-making , 2004 .

[2]  Ray Land,et al.  New Basics project technical paper , 2000 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[4]  S. Dovers Discrete, consultative policy processes: lessons from the National Conservation Strategy for Australia and the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[5]  A. Gough Education and the Environment: Policy, Trends and the Problems on Marginalisation , 1998 .

[6]  Margarita Pavlova Sustainable development: Is it an Educational Priority for French Students? , 2004 .

[7]  Robert Johnsey,et al.  The design process — Does it exist? , 1995 .

[8]  Values in Technology Education: A Two-Country Study , 2002 .

[9]  Margarita Pavlova,et al.  The place of sustainability in design & technology education , 2007 .

[10]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[11]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[12]  J. Ellul The Technological Bluff , 1990 .

[13]  John Charles Stevenson,et al.  Performance of the cognitive holding power questionnaire in schools , 1998 .

[14]  Brad Walmsley,et al.  Partnership-Centered Learning: The Case For Pedagogic Balance In Technology Education. , 2003 .

[15]  G. R. Brundtland Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .

[16]  J. Farley,et al.  WICKED PROBLEMS , 2007 .

[17]  H. Middleton Creative Thinking, Values and Design and Technology Education , 2005 .

[18]  W. Dugger Standards for Technological Literacy. Content for the Study of Technology. , 2000 .

[19]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[20]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[21]  A. Lucas Environment and Environmental Education: Conceptual Issues and Curriculum Implications. , 1972 .

[22]  S. Wooltorton Education for Sustainability: A Background Paper Prepared for the State Sustainability Strategy , 2003 .

[23]  Amy N Cutter The Value of Teachers' Knowledge: Environmental Education as a Case Study. , 2002 .

[24]  Howard Eric Middleton History of education for sustainiability in Australia , 2004 .