Effect of magnet types on performance of high speed spoke interior permanent magnet machines designed for traction applications

Interior permanent magnet machines are considered the state-of-the art for traction motors especially in light-duty hybrid and electrical vehicles. These motors usually use Neodymium Iron Boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets. These magnets include both light rare earth materials such as Neodymium (Nd) as well as heavy rare-earth materials such as Dysprosium (Dy). The main purpose of Dy is to enhance the magnet coercivity to avoid demagnetization under both high temperatures as well as flux-weakening. One of the key risks in terms of using these rare-earth magnets is the significant fluctuation/increase in their prices over the past few years. Applications that use large quantities of these magnets, such as traction motors and wind generators, are the most affected by these fluctuations. There has been an ongoing global effort to try to reduce or eliminate the use of rare earth materials (especially Dy which is the most expensive) without sacrificing too much performance. This paper will focus on advanced spoke designs targeting traction applications. The goal of this paper is to come up with new spoke designs using various grades of Dy-free magnets as well as ferrites targeting the same set of specifications. The paper will provide a detailed comparison between the various designs highlighting the key tradeoffs in terms of power density, efficiency, flux-weakening capability and magnet susceptibility to demagnetization. Also, a prototype using ferrites has been built and tested and the experimental results will be presented.

[1]  Ayman M. EL-Refaie,et al.  Advanced High-Power-Density Interior Permanent Magnet Motor for Traction Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[2]  Matthew J. Kramer,et al.  Prospects for Non-Rare Earth Permanent Magnets for Traction Motors and Generators , 2012 .

[3]  Ching Chuen Chan,et al.  Overview of Permanent-Magnet Brushless Drives for Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  S. Ogasawara,et al.  A Ferrite PM In-Wheel Motor Without Rare Earth Materials for Electric City Commuters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  T.M. Jahns,et al.  Torque Ripple Reduction in Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines Using the Principle of Mutual Harmonics Exclusion , 2007, 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Annual Meeting.

[6]  N. Bianchi,et al.  Performance comparison between switching-flux and IPM machine with rare earth and ferrite PMs , 2012, 2012 XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines.

[7]  J. Pyrhonen,et al.  Comparison of Synchronous Motors With Different Permanent Magnet and Winding Types , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[8]  Kyung-tae Kim,et al.  Design and Optimization of Neodymium-Free SPOKE-Type Motor With Segmented Wing-Shaped PM , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  Thomas M. Jahns Component rating requirements for wide constant power operation of interior PM synchronous machine drives , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[10]  Hamid A. Toliyat,et al.  Performance analysis of a rare earth magnet based NEMA frame Permanent Magnet assisted Synchronous Reluctance Machine with different magnet type and quantity , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[11]  T. Jahns,et al.  Torque Ripple Reduction in Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines Using Stators With Odd Number of Slots Per Pole Pair , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[12]  Liang Fang,et al.  Study on high-efficiency characteristics of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor with different magnet material , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.