Portable computerized polysomnography in attended and unattended settings.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We compared the validity of a new portable polysomnographic recorder against a laboratory-based polysomnographic system from the same manufacturer. DESIGN AND PATIENTS Simultaneous, full polysomnographic recordings from the portable device (PSGP) and the laboratory-based system (PSGL) were obtained using separate sets of sensors on 20 patients referred for investigation of sleep apnea. SETTING After initial optimization of signals, the portable device was left unattended in 10 of the patients (to simulate home studies), while in the other 10 the signals were reviewed on a laptop computer screen and adjustments to electrode or sensor placement made as needed during the studies. Recordings were manually scored by a technologist blinded to the origin of the data. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS The quality of signals was comparable between the PSGP and PSGL studies, apart from a slight decrease in respiratory signal quality during PSGP studies that led to reduced confidence in respiratory event scoring. SaO2 signal loss was also greater in unattended PSGP. There was good agreement between PSGP and PSGL for sleep variables and the apnea-hypopnea index (r=0.99). The periodic limb movement index was slightly lower during unattended PSGP. Blinded physician assessment of the records led to a recommendation for repeat studies due to poor signal quality in one (10%) attended and one (10%) unattended portable recording. There was no significant discordance between PSGP and PSGL in the final diagnostic formulations. CONCLUSION Portable polysomnography is a viable alternative to laboratory-based polysomnography and may be improved further by better sensor attachment.

[1]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[2]  A. Rechtschaffen,et al.  A manual of standardized terminology, technique and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects , 1968 .

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[4]  N. Saunders,et al.  Evaluation of a microprocessor-based portable home monitoring system to measure breathing during sleep. , 1987, Sleep.

[5]  M. Kryger,et al.  Nocturnal oximetry: is it a screening tool for sleep disorders? , 1995, Sleep.

[6]  J. Ebersole,et al.  An evaluation of ambulatory, cassette EEG monitoring , 1983, Neurology.

[7]  C Guilleminault,et al.  MESAM 4: an ambulatory device for the detection of patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). , 1992, Chest.

[8]  Martin Reite,et al.  ASDA standards of practice: Practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea , 1994 .

[9]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[10]  Unattended recording in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Unproven accuracy, untested assumptions, and unready for routine use. , 1994, Chest.

[11]  J R Ives,et al.  4-channel 24 hour cassette recorder for long-term EEG monitoring of ambulatory patients. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Sajkov,et al.  Sleep apnoea in patients with quadriplegia. , 1995, Thorax.

[13]  Douglas Tapper,et al.  Sleep apnea. , 2018, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[14]  J. Ebersole,et al.  An evaluation of ambulatory, cassette EEG monitoring , 1983, Neurology.

[15]  A. Apituley Assessment of Accuracy , 1997 .

[16]  David Watts Apnea , 1997, The Lancet.

[17]  E. Wolpert A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. , 1969 .

[18]  S. Redline,et al.  Measurement of sleep-related breathing disturbances in epidemiologic studies. Assessment of the validity and reproducibility of a portable monitoring device. , 1991, Chest.

[19]  D. White,et al.  Assessment of accuracy and analysis time of a novel device to monitor sleep and breathing in the home. , 1995, Sleep.

[20]  O. H. Rundell,et al.  A laboratory validation study of a portable system for remote recording of sleep-related respiratory disorders. , 1994, Chest.

[21]  C. Guilleminault,et al.  EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association. , 1992, Sleep.

[22]  J. Fleetham,et al.  Portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. ASDA standards of practice. , 1994, Sleep.

[23]  G. Marsh,et al.  Two methods of scoring sleep with the Oxford Medilog 9000: comparison to conventional paper scoring. , 1989, Sleep.

[24]  C Guilleminault,et al.  A cause of excessive daytime sleepiness. The upper airway resistance syndrome. , 1993, Chest.