The comparison of thermal tissue injuries caused by ultrasonic scalpel and electrocautery use in rabbit tongue tissue.

The aim of this study compares to the increase in tissue temperature and the thermal histological effects of ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar and unipolar electrosurgery incisions in the tongue tissue of rabbits. This study evaluates the histopathological changes related to thermal change and the maximum temperature values in the peripheral tissue brought about by the incisions carried out by the three methods in a comparative way. To assess thermal tissue damage induced by the three instruments, maximum tissue temperatures were measured during the surgical procedure and tongue tissue samples were examined histopathologically following the surgery. The mean maximum temperature values of the groups were 93.93±2.76 Cº for the unipolar electrocautery group, whereas 85.07±5.95 Cº for the bipolar electrocautery group, and 108.23±7.64 Cº for the ultrasonic scalpel group. There was a statistically significant relationship between the increase in maximum temperature values and the separation among tissue layers, edema, congestion, necrosis, hemorrhage, destruction in blood vessel walls and fibrin accumulation, and between the existence of fibrin thrombus and tissue damage depth (p<0.05). It was concluded that the bipolar electrocautery use gives way to less temperature increase in the tissues and less thermal tissue damage in comparison to the other methods.

[1]  Daniel V. Palanker,et al.  Electrosurgery With Cellular Precision , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  R. Hartung,et al.  Electrocautery: principles and practice. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[3]  C. Koch,et al.  Determination of temperature elevation in tissue during the application of the harmonic scalpel. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Shuman Ie Bipolar versus monopolar electrosurgery: clinical applications. , 2001 .

[5]  G. J. Livaditis Comparison of monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical modes for restorative dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Timothy L. Smith,et al.  Electrosurgery in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: Principles, Advances, and Complications , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  J Marotz,et al.  Reflection-optical multispectral imaging method for objective determination of burn depth. , 1999, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[8]  R. Ward,et al.  Effects of Scalpel, Electrocautery, and CO2 and KTP Lasers on Wound Healing in Rat Tongues , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  J. D. Gnanasekhar,et al.  Electrosurgery in dentistry. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[10]  D. Terris,et al.  A Comparison of Mucosal Incisions Made by Scalpel, CO2 Laser, Electrocautery, and Constant-Voltage Electrocautery , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  Z. Hajdú,et al.  Laparoscopic hiatal reconstruction and use of harmonic scalpel instrument. , 1997, Acta chirurgica Hungarica.

[12]  Robert H. Ossoff,et al.  Thermal Injury Patterns and Tensile Strength of Canine Oral Mucosa After Carbon Dioxide Laser Incisions , 1996 .

[13]  P. Bendick,et al.  The plasma scalpel: A new thermal knife , 1982, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[14]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Histologic evaluation of electrosurgery with varying frequency and waveform. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.