Trade-throughs in European cross-traded equities after transaction costs: Empirical evidence for the EURO STOXX 50

The new regulatory environment triggered by MiFID has resulted in a transformed competitive landscape and increased fragmentation among execution venues in Europe. One key component of MiFID is best execution, i.e. investment firms are obliged to achieve the best result for customer orders on a consistent basis. Specifically for retail transactions, the total consideration, i.e. price and explicit transaction costs, shall apply as a benchmark for the best result. In contrary to RegNMS, MiFID does not require to achieve the best result based on a real-time comparison of available prices. Therefore, after the introduction of MiFID the question on the extent of suboptimal order executions after transaction costs arises. Applying order book data for EURO STOXX 50 securities of ten European execution venues, this paper analyses suboptimal order executions including transaction costs by simulating an optimal Smart Order Routing engine. The results show that after explicit transaction costs, specifically cross-system settlement costs, still an economically relevant number of suboptimal order executions prevails. The developed methodology and parameters enable for assessing and future tracking of the efficiency of order execution in European equity markets and the effectiveness of regulatory measures both on the trading level, e.g. MiFID, or on the posttrading level, e.g. the Code of Conduct for Clearing and Settlement.

[1]  Sunil Wahal,et al.  Institutional trading and alternative trading systems , 2003 .

[2]  Jonathan R. Macey,et al.  The Law and Economics of Best Execution , 1997 .

[3]  Robert A. Schwartz,et al.  Equity markets in action : the fundamentals of liquidity, market structure & trading , 2004 .

[4]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Institutional Equity Trading Costs: NYSE Versus Nasdaq , 1997 .

[5]  David Porter,et al.  Fragmentation, competition, and limit orders: New evidence from interday spreads , 1998 .

[6]  T. Ho,et al.  Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industry , 1985 .

[7]  Jason T. Greene,et al.  Does the Limit Order Routing Decision Matter , 2002 .

[8]  A. Richards,et al.  The Characteristics and Trading Behavior of Dual-Listed Companies , 2003 .

[9]  Terrence Hendershott,et al.  Liquidity Externalities and Adverse Selection: Evidence from Trading after Hours , 2004 .

[10]  Herbert M. Kaufman,et al.  A Cross-Exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for Nyse-Listed Stocks , 1997 .

[11]  George Sofianos,et al.  Quantifying market order execution quality at the New York stock exchange , 2003 .

[12]  K. Kauko Interlinking Securities Settlement Systems: A Strategic Commitment? , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Ananth N. Madhavan,et al.  Consolidation, Fragmentation, and the Disclosure of Trading Information , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen R. Foerster,et al.  Multimarket Trading and Liquidity: A Transaction Data Analysis of Canada U.S. Interlistings , 1998 .

[15]  Herbert M. Kaufman,et al.  A Comparison of Trade Execution Costs for NYSE and NASDAQ-Listed Stocks , 1997, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[16]  P. Swan,et al.  Why Do Markets Fragment? A Panel-Data Analysis of Off-Exchange Trading , 2001 .

[17]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  The Accuracy of Trade Classification Rules: Evidence from NASDAQ , 2000 .

[18]  Bruno Biais,et al.  Price Formation and Equilibrium Liquidity in Fragmented and Centralized Markets , 1993 .

[19]  Robert H. Battalio Third Market Broker-Dealers: Cost Competitors or Cream Skimmers? , 1997 .

[20]  Ian Domowitz,et al.  International Cross-Listing and Order Flow Migration: Evidence from an Emerging Market , 1998 .

[21]  Christian Schlag,et al.  Internationally cross-listed stock prices during overlapping trading hours: price discovery and exchange rate effects , 2005 .

[22]  Paul Bennett,et al.  Market structure, fragmentation, and market quality , 2006 .

[23]  Robert H. Battalio,et al.  All else equal?: a multidimensional analysis of retail, market order execution quality , 2003 .

[24]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Electronic Commerce in the Retail Brokerage Industry: Trading Costs of Internet Versus Full Service Firms , 1999 .

[25]  Bhagwan Chowdhry,et al.  Multimarket Trading and Market Liquidity , 1991 .

[26]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Consolidation, Fragmentation, and Market Performance , 1987, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[27]  D. Easley,et al.  Searching for a New Center : U . S . Securities Markets in Transition , 2004 .

[28]  Joel Hasbrouck,et al.  One Security, Many Markets: Determining the Contributions to Price Discovery , 1995 .

[29]  G. Karolyi,et al.  Multi-Market Trading and Arbitrage , 2004 .

[30]  Y. Amihud,et al.  The Value of Trading Consolidation: Evidence from the Exercise of Warrants , 2002, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[31]  Jason T. Greene,et al.  Order Flow Distribution, Bid–Ask Spreads, and Liquidity Costs: Merrill Lynch's Decision to Cease Routinely Routing Orders to Regional Stock Exchanges☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[32]  S. Draus Does Inter-Market Competition Lead to Less Regulation?* , 2010 .

[33]  Peter Gomber,et al.  The Implementation of European Best Execution Obligations - An Analysis for the German Market - , 2008, FinanceCom.

[34]  Ian Domowitz Liquidity, Transaction Costs, and Reintermediation in Electronic Markets , 2002 .

[35]  Kenneth A. Froot,et al.  How are Stock Prices Affected by the Location of Trade? , 1998 .

[36]  M. Blume,et al.  Displayed and Effective Spreads By Market , 1992 .

[37]  Cheol S. Eun,et al.  Cross‐Border Listings and Price Discovery: Evidence from U.S.‐Listed Canadian Stocks , 2003 .

[38]  Thierry Foucault,et al.  Competition for Order Flow and Smart Order Routing Systems , 2006 .

[39]  Hendrik Bessembinder Trade Execution Costs on Nasdaq and the NYSE: A Post-Reform Comparison , 1998 .