Opposite Feedbacks in the Hippo Pathway for Growth Control and Neural Fate

Introduction: A finite number of signaling pathways are repurposed during animal development to regulate an extraordinary array of cellular decisions. Elucidating context-specific mechanisms is crucial for understanding how cellular diversity is generated and for defining potential avenues of pathway misregulation during disease. The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway has been primarily studied in growth control where it inhibits the oncogenic transcriptional coactivator Yorkie (Yki) (YAP/TAZ in vertebrates). The Hippo pathway also functions in nongrowth contexts such as postmitotic fate specification. In the Drosophila visual system, R8 photoreceptor neurons terminally differentiate into one of two alternative subtypes that express either blue-light–sensitive Rhodopsin5 (Rh5) or green-light–sensitive Rhodopsin6 (Rh6). These mutually exclusive cell fates are established by the Hippo pathway kinase warts and the growth regulator gene melted, which repress each other’s expression. However, the mechanisms underlying the context-specific use of the Hippo pathway in postmitotic fate decisions remain unclear. Context-specific regulation by the Hippo signaling in postmitotic photoreceptors. The Hippo pathway uses negative feedback through its transcriptional effector Yki for homeostatic control of proliferation. In Drosophila eyes, two alternative fates of blue- versus green-sensitive R8 photoreceptors are regulated by antagonism between the growth regulator Melted and the Hippo pathway. Contrary to the growth mechanism, Yki positive feedback and a cell-type–restricted transcription factor network promote repurposing of the Hippo pathway for binary fate decisions. Methods: To define the regulatory mechanisms of Hippo-dependent cell fate decisions in Drosophila photoreceptor neurons, we used a combination of genetic epistasis analyses, in vivo cis-regulatory studies, a candidate gene RNA interference screen, and cell culture–based transcription assays Results: We show that the transcriptional output of the Hippo pathway in photoreceptor differentiation, as in cell proliferation, is mediated through the factors Yki and Scalloped. In contrast to growth control, where Yki limits its own activity by negative feedback, we identify two Yki positive-feedback mechanisms: In blue-sensitive Rh5 photoreceptors, Yki represses its own negative regulator warts, downstream of melted; Yki also promotes melted expression, which subsequently represses warts to further promote Yki function. Yki cooperates with the transcription factors Orthodenticle (Otd) and Traffic Jam (Tj) to promote melted expression and Rh5 photoreceptor fate. Otd and Tj, othologs of the mammalian OTX/CRX and MAF/NRL transcription factors, form an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional module for generating photoreceptor subtype diversity. We also show that the transcription factors Senseless and Pph13 create a permissive environment for Warts/Hippo signaling to promote the alternative “default” green-sensitive Rh6 fate. Hence, Hippo pathway function integrates with four cell-type–restricted transcription factors, each promoting genetically different aspects of R8 subtypes, such that Yki activity ultimately coordinates the binary fate decision between blue- and green-sensitive photoreceptors. Discussion: This work illustrates how molecular signaling pathways can adopt context-specific regulation. Yki positive feedback in the photoreceptor fate decision is opposite to the negative feedback found in Hippo growth control. These distinct network-level feedback mechanisms provide context-appropriate functions: homeostasis to fine-tune growth regulation and an all-or-nothing fate decision to ensure robust differentiation of sensory neuron subtypes. Altering network-level systems properties, such as positive or negative feedback, within biochemically conserved pathways may be broadly used to co-opt signaling networks for use in cellular contexts as distinct as proliferation and terminal differentiation. Complexity and Diversity Complex organisms must produce and maintain an extraordinary diversity of cell and tissue types with a limited number of genes and molecular pathways. Cells accomplish this by reusing the same signaling networks at different times, in different tissues, and for different purposes, yet how this context-specificity is achieved is poorly understood. Jukam et al. (1238016, published online 29 August) show how a set of genes that function in cell and tissue growth can be used again in nondividing fly photoreceptor neurons to ensure that flies develop appropriate sensitivity to both blue and green light. The Hippo pathway undergoes a regulatory change—from negative to positive feedback—that requires a tissue-specific transcription factor network. This network uses evolutionarily conserved regulatory factors whose mutations in humans result in degenerative retinal diseases. The context-appropriate positive feedback in flies ensures an all-or-nothing fate decision necessary to establish a functional visual system. Hippo directs cell differentiation and fate through context- and tissue-specific feedback and transcription networks. Signaling pathways are reused for multiple purposes in plant and animal development. The Hippo pathway in mammals and Drosophila coordinates proliferation and apoptosis via the coactivator and oncoprotein YAP/Yorkie (Yki), which is homeostatically regulated through negative feedback. In the Drosophila eye, cross-repression between the Hippo pathway kinase LATS/Warts (Wts) and growth regulator Melted generates mutually exclusive photoreceptor subtypes. Here, we show that this all-or-nothing neuronal differentiation results from Hippo pathway positive feedback: Yki both represses its negative regulator, warts, and promotes its positive regulator, melted. This postmitotic Hippo network behavior relies on a tissue-restricted transcription factor network—including a conserved Otx/Orthodenticle-Nrl/Traffic Jam feedforward module—that allows Warts-Yki-Melted to operate as a bistable switch. Altering feedback architecture provides an efficient mechanism to co-opt conserved signaling networks for diverse purposes in development and evolution.

[1]  Kairong Cui,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of Rod Photoreceptor Homeostasis Revealed by In Vivo NRL Targetome Analysis , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[2]  D. Godt,et al.  The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  Shian Wu,et al.  hippo Encodes a Ste-20 Family Protein Kinase that Restricts Cell Proliferation and Promotes Apoptosis in Conjunction with salvador and warts , 2003, Cell.

[4]  Elizabeth C. McDonald,et al.  Pph13 and Orthodenticle define a dual regulatory pathway for photoreceptor cell morphogenesis and function , 2010, Development.

[5]  Elizabeth C. McDonald,et al.  Separable transcriptional regulatory domains within Otd control photoreceptor terminal differentiation events. , 2010, Developmental biology.

[6]  B. Dickson,et al.  Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. , 2000, Development.

[7]  David Jukam,et al.  Dissection and immunohistochemistry of larval, pupal and adult Drosophila retinas. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[8]  B. Thompson,et al.  Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network , 2010, Developmental cell.

[9]  G. Feldmann,et al.  Elucidation of a Universal Size-Control Mechanism in Drosophila and Mammals , 2007, Cell.

[10]  R. Carthew,et al.  Making a better RNAi vector for Drosophila: use of intron spacers. , 2003, Methods.

[11]  L. Johnston,et al.  Evidence for a growth-stabilizing regulatory feedback mechanism between Myc and Yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of Yap. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[12]  Gerald B Call,et al.  G-TRACE: rapid Gal4-based cell lineage analysis in Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[13]  Esteban O. Mazzoni,et al.  The Growth Regulators warts/lats and melted Interact in a Bistable Loop to Specify Opposite Fates in Drosophila R8 Photoreceptors , 2005, Cell.

[14]  V. Litvak,et al.  Sprouty Fine-Tunes EGF Signaling through Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2003, Current Biology.

[15]  B. Dickson,et al.  A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila , 2007, Nature.

[16]  D. Papatsenko,et al.  Otd/Crx, a dual regulator for the specification of ommatidia subtypes in the Drosophila retina. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[17]  E. Mazzoni,et al.  Feedback from Rhodopsin controls rhodopsin exclusion in Drosophila photoreceptors , 2011, Nature.

[18]  B. Wang,et al.  The TEAD/TEF family of transcription factor Scalloped mediates Hippo signaling in organ size control. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[19]  G. Halder,et al.  Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond , 2011, Development.

[20]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry , 2008, Nature.

[21]  David Jukam,et al.  Binary regulation of Hippo pathway by Merlin/NF2, Kibra, Lgl, and Melted specifies and maintains postmitotic neuronal fate. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[22]  K. Irvine,et al.  Cooperative regulation of growth by Yorkie and Mad through bantam. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[23]  A. Scully,et al.  Mutation of the photoreceptor specific homeodomain gene Pph13 results in defects in phototransduction and rhabdomere morphogenesis , 2003, Development.

[24]  D. Papatsenko,et al.  Distinction between color photoreceptor cell fates is controlled by Prospero in Drosophila. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[25]  Shian Wu,et al.  The TEAD/TEF family protein Scalloped mediates transcriptional output of the Hippo growth-regulatory pathway. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[26]  G. Mardon,et al.  senseless Repression of rough Is Required for R8 Photoreceptor Differentiation in the Developing Drosophila Eye , 2001, Neuron.

[27]  Li Li,et al.  Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. , 2007, Genes & development.

[28]  T. Schwarz,et al.  A genetic method for generating Drosophila eyes composed exclusively of mitotic clones of a single genotype. , 1999, Genetics.

[29]  D. Haber,et al.  salvador Promotes Both Cell Cycle Exit and Apoptosis in Drosophila and Is Mutated in Human Cancer Cell Lines , 2002, Cell.

[30]  Elizabeth C. McDonald,et al.  Senseless functions as a molecular switch for color photoreceptor differentiation in Drosophila , 2007, Development.

[31]  D. Flagiello,et al.  SCALLOPED Interacts with YORKIE, the Nuclear Effector of the Hippo Tumor-Suppressor Pathway in Drosophila , 2008, Current Biology.

[32]  T. Xu,et al.  Identifying tumor suppressors in genetic mosaics: the Drosophila lats gene encodes a putative protein kinase. , 1995, Development.

[33]  A. Eychène,et al.  A new MAFia in cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[34]  Mineo Kondo,et al.  Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Thomas Labhart,et al.  Homothorax Switches Function of Drosophila Photoreceptors from Color to Polarized Light Sensors , 2003, Cell.

[36]  E. Mazzoni,et al.  Iroquois Complex Genes Induce Co-Expression of rhodopsins in Drosophila , 2008, PLoS biology.

[37]  K. Kataoka Multiple mechanisms and functions of maf transcription factors in the regulation of tissue-specific genes. , 2007, Journal of biochemistry.

[38]  Simon G. Sprecher,et al.  Switch of rhodopsin expression in terminally differentiated Drosophila sensory neurons , 2008, Nature.

[39]  M. Wigler,et al.  Identification and Validation of Oncogenes in Liver Cancer Using an Integrative Oncogenomic Approach , 2006, Cell.

[40]  Enrique Blanco,et al.  Coordinate control of synaptic-layer specificity and rhodopsins in photoreceptor neurons , 2008, Nature.

[41]  K. Irvine,et al.  In vivo regulation of Yorkie phosphorylation and localization , 2008, Development.

[42]  Jan Koster,et al.  OTX2 directly activates cell cycle genes and inhibits differentiation in medulloblastoma cells , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[43]  A. Jackson,et al.  A conserved retina-specific gene encodes a basic motif/leucine zipper domain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Li Li,et al.  The Hippo-YAP pathway in organ size control and tumorigenesis: an updated version. , 2010, Genes & development.

[45]  Kenji Kohno,et al.  Translational Pausing Ensures Membrane Targeting and Cytoplasmic Splicing of XBP1u mRNA , 2011, Science.

[46]  R. Maeda,et al.  An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Jianbin Huang,et al.  The Hippo Signaling Pathway Coordinately Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis by Inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of YAP , 2005, Cell.

[48]  Esteban O. Mazzoni,et al.  Stochastic spineless expression creates the retinal mosaic for colour vision , 2006, Nature.

[49]  P J Bryant,et al.  The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene warts encodes a homolog of human myotonic dystrophy kinase and is required for the control of cell shape and proliferation. , 1995, Genes & development.

[50]  G. Halder,et al.  The tumour-suppressor genes NF2/Merlin and Expanded act through Hippo signalling to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  R. Fehon,et al.  Isolation of mutations in the Drosophila homologues of the human Neurofibromatosis 2 and yeast CDC42 genes using a simple and efficient reverse-genetic method. , 1997, Genetics.

[52]  C. Desplan,et al.  Establishing and maintaining gene expression patterns: insights from sensory receptor patterning , 2013, Development.

[53]  Ralf J. Sommer,et al.  The evolution of signalling pathways in animal development , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[55]  D. Johnson,et al.  orthodenticle is required for photoreceptor cell development in the Drosophila eye. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[56]  G. Wilkie,et al.  Merlin, the Drosophila homologue of neurofibromatosis-2, is specifically required in posterior follicle cells for axis formation in the oocyte. , 2001, Development.

[57]  Matthew Slattery,et al.  Transcription factor choice in the Hippo signaling pathway: homothorax and yorkie regulation of the microRNA bantam in the progenitor domain of the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. , 2009, Genes & development.

[58]  G. Rubin,et al.  Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. , 1993, Development.

[59]  Jianmin Zhang,et al.  Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Progress in Sensory Physiology , 1991, Progress in Sensory Physiology.

[61]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  hSpry2 Is Targeted to the Ubiquitin-Dependent Proteasome Pathway by c-Cbl , 2003, Current Biology.

[62]  A. Swaroop,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of photoreceptor development and homeostasis in the mammalian retina , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2007, Nature.

[64]  A. Teleman,et al.  Drosophila Melted modulates FOXO and TOR activity. , 2005, Developmental cell.